Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
What should be the center of enducation system is always been question of debate. Should the foundation of edcucation system is morality or the logical reasoning, given that the target is to produce moral society. Although having logical reasoning helps an individual achieve a great success, moral compass is require to connect with the world, to empathize with them and have a sense of responsibility. If goal is to create an individual with moral values, then teaching morality is vital.
Logical reasoning allow us to make decision, that are best for us. Morality, on the other hand, encourages us to think about bigger picture and make a choice which is good for all. For instance, the logical reasoning help an individual earn a great wealth. Morality helps that individual to give back to society by donation, having created sense of responsibility. If he or she is not moral enough, then they might not pay back to society, and at the same time, he or she is don't think logically, will they have ebough to pay back to society. This situation create a dilemma in deciding which is best. Logical reasoning and moraloty is not opposite qualitites, to create a successful individual, they both are required, but when it comes to produce moral society, the focus should be more on teaching morality.
Moreover, there is always a reson required for some action. If one can justify that reason, then it is rational thinking. But sometimes, the choice is too hard to defined by rationality or logical reasoning, then one must follow the gut feeling. If an individual had taught the lessons of morality, the gut feeling must be taking selfless or a good decision which can produce no harm to others. The gut feeling is the decision one can not explain the reason behind, but somehow it is coming from the past experiences an individual have.
In summary, logical reasoning ensures the survival of individual, where morality gives choices to ensure survival as whole group. As human being an social animal, we must follow morality, but as being animal, the logical reasoning is also vital, because social societies are compatetive in itself. One have best chance for success and survival, if they manage having both morality and rational thinking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Opak Pulu | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | abhbat | 50 | view |
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 62
- During the past year, the channel company has devoted the late night show to national affairs and consequently Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this 75
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 41
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 34
- The emergence of the online “blogosphere” and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'connecting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: connecting
...great success, moral compass is require to connect with the world, to empathize with them ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... moral values, then teaching morality is vital. Logical reasoning allow us to ...
^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ety, and at the same time, he or she is dont think logically, will they have ebough ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'creates'.
Suggestion: creates
... to pay back to society. This situation create a dilemma in deciding which is best. Lo...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...hind, but somehow it is coming from the past experiences an individual have. In summary, log...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...survival as whole group. As human being an social animal, we must follow morality,...
^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the best'.
Suggestion: have the best
...ocieties are compatetive in itself. One have best chance for success and survival, if the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, then, for instance, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96560846561 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66733451996 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489417989418 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8856966279 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7894736842 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8947368421 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.10526315789 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270587931945 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857623450987 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872186607692 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169156458152 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084042150296 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.