Politics is a game of power, it is not only confined to the government but also to the organizations. People are given power to work for the welfare of citizens of the nation or for the organization. The focus should be on the betterment of the public whether it is through ideal decisions or by finding common grounds. However, in my opinion it is difficult to stick to the ideal decision to make decision in favor of all people and searching for common grounds is better idea. I would like to explain this in the following essay.
First and foremost, the ideal decision made may not be beneficial for all people. For example, the needs and requirements of people living in rural areas are different from the people of urban areas. Thus, in such cases it become important to find common grounds in order to satisfy all. Also, the ideal decision varies from person to person as something which is perfect for me may not be consummate for other. During my childhood I did not like to go to school that time for me the ideal decision was not going to school due my ignorance as a child towards the importance of studies. This shows that goal of a person differs from one another depending upon various factors. Therefore, it is better to find common grounds in order to make a good decision as at the end of the day it is more important that more and more are affected in a better way by the decision made by those who are in power.
Besides this, ideal decisions that focuses on providing food, education and medical facilities to all should be fulfilled. The basic needs are same for all people. Thus, these ideal goals should be taken care of. However, there are few things that are to be taken care of as most of the time the decisions are to be made by reaching the reasonable accord.
In conclusion, by sticking to the pursuit of ideals decision cannot be made as they may not be advantageous to large number of people. Therefore, goals of leader should finding the common grounds so that the purpose of being in power is solved that is people from all sections gets the benefit of the decision made.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
... of urban areas. Thus, in such cases it become important to find common grounds in ord...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge number of people. Therefore, goals of leader should finding the common grounds...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51958224543 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47161279041 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454308093995 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6871978646 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1666666667 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2777777778 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2510899317 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888803840363 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677365450124 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18181443176 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411951043131 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 12.1639044944 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.