Some people claim that a nation s government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns wit

Essay topics:

Some people claim that a nation's government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state.
Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain.

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position,
you should address both of the views presented.

In today's world where there is a steep decrease in forests, trees and wildlife, it is a topic which demands focus and attention. When one group of people might argue that the wilderness should be developed for economic gain, I completely disagree with their thoughts. A government must preserve it's wilderness areas and I would like to back my stance with the following examples.
Firstly, in the past few decades wildlife has faced a rapid descent due to human intervention with its environment. Burning and demolishing of raft of forests for factories and houses have caused a displacement of wildlife from their indigenous environment. Humans must understand that we live in a balanced ecosystem and by interfering and dislocating the local fauna, we are creating an imbalance in the natural ecosystem, that is, the chain of all life. And to avert this deleterious imbalance, the government must take the steps to preserve the wilderness areas.
Moreover, some nations, for example, India, have taken few measures to make this possible. The forests in India have been classified into many categories and some forests have been categorized under 'Reserved forests' which prevents the general
public from entering or interfering with the forest in any manner. These forests are in their pristine state teeming with wild animals and beautiful trees, assiduously taken care of by experts. These forests also act as a source of income for the government
by making them open to public for sight seeing with limited interaction. Hence, all the governments must try to work towards a collective goal of wilderness preservation.
Finally, it can be seen that by developing these areas, it leads to potential economic gain of the nation but this growth is only temporary and in the long run, the resources and balance that the wilderness provides will become void and the people of the nation will have to pay the consequences.
To conclude, it's the responsibility of the government and every human being on this planet, to preserve what mother nature has provided to us and not tarnish it. Its not only a duty towards oneself but also toward the future generations to come and by taking the measures to preserve wilderness areas, we will be leaving them a better place to live in.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (5 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'decades'' or 'decade's'?
Suggestion: decades'; decade's
...ing examples. Firstly, in the past few decades wildlife has faced a rapid descent due ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...der Reserved forests which prevents the general public from entering or interfering with the f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... to pay the consequences. To conclude, its the responsibility of the government an...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03439153439 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78933975732 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558201058201 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1598846249 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.866666667 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274731613363 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842565877944 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644130865938 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120005035031 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752589586031 0.0667264976115 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.