Sometimes imaginations is a more valuable asset than experience. People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible and thus can approach a task without constraints of established habits and attitudes.
Is imagination more valuable than experience? The speaker’s answer is yes, because the speaker claims that people lacked of experience are not restricted by specific attitudes and thoughts. However, I’m suspicious to the validity of assertion in many situations. Although it may be true that the laypeople sometimes are free from restriction and thus coming up with innovative ideas, it is unjustifiable to say they are more valuable than experts.
Admittedly, sometimes a beginner or a lay person provides more imaginative thoughts. They are bold and revolutionary because they are less constrained by the rules or biases than professionals. This happened frequently in the field of art, that the works are based on creative and innovation. A song writer can integrate different elements into their pieces and produce refreshing songs and win popularity of public; a new-graduate painter can carve out a new style with their innovative though that break the old stereotype of art.
On the other hand, the ideas of laypeople usually have meager of deliberation, largely depend on one’s quixotic and fantasy thought and thus easier to fail. Considering that a novice who intend to run a restaurant. He or she may conjure up many romantic ideas, such as decorating the space with beautiful ornaments, or providing customers with spacious area so that they can have an agreeable environment to enjoy their meal. However, these proposal may be unrealistic: luxury decoration can be costly, spacious place means fewer customers can be served at one time. This way to run the restaurant is contradict to the goal of a business: making money. And thus, without deliberate on these aspects of running a business, the restaurants may be closed due to the financial pressure.
Furthermore, in the fields which entail professional foundation, experienced people are much more valuable than outsiders. Today many fields are based on sophisticated knowledge accumulated from the constant effort of people, an outsider is hard to contribute a constructive suggestion or idea to it. This especially important in the realm of science, the theories among science are interconnected, to make a break through in the field needs one to master it. For example, to advance in semiconductor process, we need to know the knowledge of quantum mechanics, semiconductor physics, and electronic engineering. An arbitrary suggestion in this field may overtly contradict to one of the theory and turn out to be unachievable. Therefore, in these areas well-trained staff are more valuable than others.
In sum, people who are free from restriction sometimes have more creativity and boldness to break the stereotype. However, in most of situations, experienced people have more vantage that they know the details and rules that makes their ideas more accessible and achievable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this proposal' or 'these proposals'?
Suggestion: this proposal; these proposals
...vironment to enjoy their meal. However, these proposal may be unrealistic: luxury decoration c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 602, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'contradicted'.
Suggestion: contradicted
...time. This way to run the restaurant is contradict to the goal of a business: making money...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 127, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the situations') or simply say ''most situations''.
Suggestion: most of the situations; most situations
...ss to break the stereotype. However, in most of situations, experienced people have more vantage t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2414.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 451.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35254988914 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10841021265 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547671840355 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 764.1 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4334125841 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.727272727 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219950044387 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715342752871 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102289914227 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130219097975 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901735499365 0.0667264976115 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.