Sometimes imagination is a more valuable asset than experience. People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible and thus can approach a task without constraints of established habits and attitudes.
The author here believes that sometimes imagination has more value than experience, asserting that those people who lack experience are free to imagine whatever they think is possible and can do some task without constraints of established habits and attitudes. I agree here with the author’s assertion that ‘sometimes’, this is true. However, I also believe there are many cases where experience and a set of established constraints are more valuable than imagination.
It is true, that a person with a limited experience can approach some task without any established habits or attitudes. There are many cases where being creative and imaginative turns out to be more valuable than having an experience. Consider a novelist, for example, who is writing a fictional novel. Now this novelist of course should have a good experience in writing novels, to effectively communicate their story to the readers. But, more importantly, this novelist needs to have a really good imagination. If the story is not something new or creative, it won’t be loved that much by the readers, and since, the story is fictional, it totally is depended on the imagination of the novelist
Another example, could be a fictional movie director who has to imagine how to shoot scenes in a way that would look good on screen. Here also, imagination plays more important role than experience in film making. Similarly, a painter needs to have more imagination than just being experienced. There are a lot of cases throughout history, where even novice have produced such a great work which the experience were not able to do. These beginners certainly lack experience, but they definitely do not lack imagination.
However, there are also numerous cases where experience plays a far more crucial role than imagination. Imaginative things are very much prone to errors, since they are not guided by a set of established habits and conventions. Only an experienced person can take help from their knowledge in an efficient and a systematic way. A scientist, for example, cannot conduct experiments simply because they imagined something will come up. They need to apply their experience and knowledge in a proper manner to really find something useful.
Similarly, in making a business strategy, experience plays a much important role than imagination. Here, a domain expert needs to apply their experience and skills to make a good business strategy. They need to follow a systematic approach with predefined habits that came from experience. If they rely on imagination, they might end up being the reason for the loss in business.
Therefore, in conclusion, I would agree with the assertion that ‘sometimes’ imagination is more valuable than experience, and, can approach a task without a set of pre-established habits and attitudes. But, there certainly are many cases where experience is a must have and is actually more important than imagination.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 485, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper manner" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...to apply their experience and knowledge in a proper manner to really find something useful. Sim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, really, similarly, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, of course, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2494.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 473.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15977770811 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450317124736 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 820.8 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.169190087 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.916666667 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7083333333 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410472794837 0.243740707755 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119873167407 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129023573191 0.0758088955206 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244921264743 0.150359130593 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126587987078 0.0667264976115 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.