"There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer's expectations or desires."
The author here believes that there is nothing like purely objective observation and that whatever a person is related to some emotions or is subjective. I somewhat agree with this assertion and feels this is true very often. But, I also believe that this case may not be true ‘always’.
We observe, in fact, most of the things in a subjective way. We connect some emotion, to that observation, which could originate from anything. Sometimes, people relate the current scene of observation to a previous observation or experience. Now, whenever we see something similar, our mind recollects our previous experience and exhume what emotion we attested to that experience before. Our brain then links this emotion to the current scene of observation, thus providing a subjective perspective. A good example of this case could be when you are presented a scene of a malnourished kid. Your brain recollects a previous scene in which you saw a malnourished kid, and that you felt sad and full of pity at that time. Now this emotion again gets linked to the current scene and you observe this scene with a morose and pitiful emotion, and so, this observation becomes subjective.
Sometimes, we see something that is a new experience, but, related to someone or something you know. Your brain would then observe this scene in respect to what emotion you had for that person or thing. For example, if you see something that reminds you of your good old friend, then you will see that object or scene with an emotion which was related to that friend, and thus, this observation would be subjective.
However, this is not always the case. In conditions where the scene of observation is totally new, and, no part of it is reminiscent to you, then you would have a totally objective observation. Say for example, an employee working in an office faces a totally unfamiliar situation, and none of that it reminds the employee of something or someone. This employee would now observe this situation with a totally objective perception, and, would try to analyse and understand it. Then, after an objective observation would this employee link an emotion to this situation, which could then be used by brain for future subjective observations.
Another good example could be a detective studying a crime scene or a judge taking a decision in court. These people have to make their mind free from subjective emotions to take a proper observation, or a fair decision. In this case, even if the brain of these people adds some emotion to the scene, they have to keep it aside, to be fair to themselves and to others and study the case with an objective view.
So, in conclusion, I think that most often, an observation is subjective, as somehow our brain links some emotions with that scene, but, there can be cases where an observation is, or has to be totally objective. The type of observation, thus, totally depends on the particular case for that particular person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a subjective way" with adverb for "subjective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...We observe, in fact, most of the things in a subjective way. We connect some emotion, to that obser...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, thus, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 67.0 33.0505617978 203% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 12.9106741573 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2472.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 505.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89504950495 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82878339374 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.413861386139 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 787.5 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2350151677 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0416666667 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139224427733 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052141723768 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502156891035 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867614004938 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290165731461 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.