People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The author of the statement asserts that those people, who take decisions emotionally, and then try to justify those decisions based on logic, are poor decision makers. I agree with the author's assertion and myself feel that these kind of people are not ideal decision makers.
There are some people, who do not think practically about the decisions they are taking. They just take those decisions based on how they feel at that time and when they are asked about it, they try to give some logic as an explanation. Usually it happens that these decisions go wrong, or are not an optimal solution to the problem.
For example, consider a student who was about to go abroad for further studies in a very reputed university, but due to becoming emotional having to leave his family, decides to cancel that decision and joins a local university. This person took his decision based solely on his emotions at that time and it was not practical. When asked about it, he would rather give explanations like the place was not good or there are better universities nearby, etc.
Although these emotional decisions might have felt good at that time, they usually become a cause for regret to the decision makers later on, when they realize that they should have thought practically. It is possible that emotions can change over time, but it is rarely possible that the subjective decisions taken earlier could be changed or reversed. Continuing the example above, even if that student later feels that he took a bad decision, he still could not reverse his decision.
So, in conclusion, I would again agree with the authors decision that people who take decisions based on emotions are not good decision makers. They may later on try to give logical reasoning for their decision, but it wouldn't change the fact that their decision was not practical. Rather than regretting later on, it would be better to take decisions practically.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... poor decision makers. I agree with the authors assertion and myself feel that these ki...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... authors assertion and myself feel that these kind of people are not ideal decision makers...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith the authors decision that people who take decisions based on emotions are not...
^^
Line 17, column 221, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...al reasoning for their decision, but it wouldnt change the fact that their decision was...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, then, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 328.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9237804878 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4641823695 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481707317073 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9596615898 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.357142857 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454340886008 0.243740707755 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182117337817 0.0831039109588 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159900769091 0.0758088955206 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295308765621 0.150359130593 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162403745558 0.0667264976115 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.