The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
According to the statement given, the speaker asserts that it would be the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industries and various other fields by instilling a sense of cooperation in them instead of competition. I would, however, not completely agree with this statement, since I believe that a person should equally have a sense of competition along with cooperation.
Every major field and task, most of the time requires a group of people to work together and not individual people. Since, a person has to work and sustain in a community, the person should have a good sense of cooperation. Those people who do not have this sense are not able to successfully sustain in the environment and along with that they also decrease the total productivity of the group of people they are working with. Sometimes, it also happens that to perform a task, a person needs to work with new people. Therefor the person should be able to adapt with every case and for that should have a good sense of cooperation.
But, along with that, a person also equally requires a good sense of competition. There are at a time many people/groups that do a particular type of work, and there is always a competition among them, to acquire larger market and gain maximum profit or to serve maximum number of people. So, in order to sustain successfully in a market, a leader should always know what new things are coming up in the market and how well their competitiors are doing. If a person do not have a competitive sense, then the competitiors usually get a higher chance of success. Also, having a competition encourages growth, since the competitiors try to serve their users in the best possible way.
If a person does not have a cooperative sense, the person is not able to perform in and aong with the group and if the person does not have a good sense of competition, the person's team do not have a good hold of their market of consumers and are generally slow in growing up with new innovations and ideas. Therefore, it is absolutely necessary for a person to have both - sense of cooperation and sense of competition.
Competitions where people compete in a groups are a good source of instilling both thypes of senses. Since, a person along with coordinating with the group members also plays an important part to get maximum success for the whole group. Group leaders also get a good experience of how to handle different circumstances and manage their team and resources. So, these kinds of activities and competitions should be promoted in schools and colleges so that a person can learn these senses well from a young age.
Thus, in conclusion I would say that a person should have a good sense of cooperation along with a good sense of competition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...innovations and ideas. Therefore, it is absolutely necessary for a person to have both - sense of co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 38, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a group' or simply 'groups'?
Suggestion: a group; groups
... Competitions where people compete in a groups are a good source of instilling both th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2320.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74437627812 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79753863375 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41308793456 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 736.2 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0850937534 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.105263158 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7368421053 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42105263158 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227652996751 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086346614462 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133562025765 0.0758088955206 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151498393089 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146268750674 0.0667264976115 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.