Sports stars and movie stars have a job to complete by influencing the young generation as they follow them blindly. And they have been paid millions of dollars for one shoot or ad or anything so it is their responsibility to fulfill these societal responsibility.
The claim states that the sports and movie stars have to behave like a role model for younger generation as they look up to them. For this they are paid millions of dollars and so it is expected out of them to fulfill the societal responsibilities. I strongly agree with the claim for many following reasons.
Firstly, the movie and sports stars are the people which are very poplular and are seen on screen. People, especially young people, admire the stars without knowing the background and reality. Young people just beieve what they see on screen which may be a movie or a series or a sports match. But the harsh reality is always hidden behind the camera. Because young people admire them, they have an obligation to potray as a role model as whatever they do, young generation just blindly follows them. This helps brand to capture a huge crowd. For example, the advertisement for "Boost"; they brought Sachin Tendular as the face of the brand and suddenly all the children and young people started drinking boost as Sachin was also drinking. But everyone knows Sachin was just doing his job to attract young people. As in reality he was not drinking the boost. Therefore, the movie and sporst stars have an obligation to behave as role model for the young people.
Secondly, the movie and sports stars does not come for free. They have some amount to be paid for their acting and the amount is not some easy amount, it is a huge amount. So, if the brand or anyone pays that much amount then it is practically impossible out of them to not expect them to not to do their job of influencing and fulfilling their societal responsibilities. If they don't fulfill the responsibilities then not only their money is wasted but also the future profit they were going to attract is also lost. For example, Kartik Aryan was the face of Vivo phones and he took a lot of fees approximately 1-2 crore indian rupees. So it is very obvious that he should fulfill his responsibility of influencing young generation that this is the phone of the generation but instead when he stepped out in public he used Apple iPhone. So now, that shows he was doing it for money. So the company lost a lot of money as well as a crowd. Therefore, it is necessary that movie and sports stars fulfill their societal responsibilities.
In spite of this, there are some points with which I do disagree with the claim. The movie stars and sports stars are not directly connected to the brand and they do it as they are famous and people want them in it and also money. So it is not solely their responsibility to influence the young generation. And now the young generation is smart enough to know which brand to follow and get influenced, as there have many reviews available online.
However, I strongly believe that sports and movie stars have a job to complete by influencing the young generation as they follow them blindly. And they have been paid millions of dollars for one shoot or ad or anything so it is their responsibility to fulfill this societal responsibilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 825, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... doing his job to attract young people. As in reality he was not drinking the boos...
^^
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...heir societal responsibilities. If they dont fulfill the responsibilities then not o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 885, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
..., that shows he was doing it for money. So the company lost a lot of money as well...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2530.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 542.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66789667897 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69587691585 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.40036900369 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 774.0 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0172569274 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3571428571 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.558894004603 0.243740707755 229% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150920945412 0.0831039109588 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133249042328 0.0758088955206 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.402932870485 0.150359130593 268% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.192828052692 0.0667264976115 289% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.