Active learning based on thought process to enhance the knowledge is always appreciable rather than accepting the theories put forward as a basis of basic education system. The prompt asserts that students are required to shoot out questions based on their learning, instead of accepting the lessons inactively. In my opinion, the exalted state of a pupil with counter statements on the syllabus approached should always be encouraged so that he/she gets a better idea on the pithy knowledge. It can be attributed to the following three consequences that the student will achieve in near future : Method of analysis, Active participation, Increased reasoning ability.
The analysis capability that a child develops at very tender age, is supposed to elevate the knowledge acquired. An effervescent pupil participating actively to indulge in to the subject is likely to dig in to the basics of the subject. By laying a strong foundation at a very nascent stage, students develop the capacity to resolve extraordinary subject issues they may face while pursuing higher studies. For instance, entrenching the fundamentals of basic mathematics at a very early stage is putative to be carried along with them for a life long problem solving. There are numerous applications that people face growing up like financial, economical management that requires rigorous knowledge related to the basics of a subject.
The student - teacher interaction that is actively fueled by questions, gets interesting by participation from the students. In fact, a questionnaire session supplies answers to many of the inactive students. Thus, a session that is role based or communication based, is likely to increase the participation from the entire classroom. Though a theory session enhances the mathematical portion of the subjects , an experimental session with hands on experience for the students acknowledges the purpose of the studies rendered. To exemplify, quite a boring physics session to explain the refraction of light through a clear prism, can be transformed in to an interesting pragmatic session with students reasoning out the theory using real prisms at laboratory. On the other hand, such a super interactive session will be helpful for the practitioners to identify lackluster students out of the classroom. Consequently, the teacher can pay special attention for the late learners.
With a rapidly changing curricula in the science and technology, students seeking knowledge are prone to develop their cognitive ability by putting forward questions. In the realm of science, reasoning forms the basis of other abilities. If there is a tendency to state a thesis at a very young age, then there is much assurance about the child being precocious by nature. Thus, analyzing and reasoning increases the chance of a student surviving in the abrupt shifts in technology. Nevertheless, a dull headed passive student without these characteristics flag down in to these shifts in technologies.
To summarize, there are people who may argue about taking a chance by pursuing passive learning. However, the advantages of active learning nearly outweighs the laconic way of approach in education. For students to be a prodigy and illustrious like Einstein, questioning is ultimately a potential requirement.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 644, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... people face growing up like financial, economical management that requires rigorous knowl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the mathematical portion of the subjects , an experimental session with hands on e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, thus, while, for instance, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 58.6224719101 148% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2793.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 513.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12164668952 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 882.9 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2507740546 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.375 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145273139694 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038916652081 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279355627075 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811184282154 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216847052566 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 100.480337079 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 644, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... people face growing up like financial, economical management that requires rigorous knowl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the mathematical portion of the subjects , an experimental session with hands on e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, thus, while, for instance, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 58.6224719101 148% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2793.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 513.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12164668952 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 882.9 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2507740546 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.375 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145273139694 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038916652081 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279355627075 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811184282154 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216847052566 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 100.480337079 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.