The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.
It is irrefutable that a nation’s growth has relied on numerous factors like the efficiency of the leaders, achievements in arts, advancement in science and technology, etc., However, the most cardinal factor that determines the real growth of a country is the well-being of its people. Only if people are given all the basic needs and people are happy being in the country, then a country is truly progressing on the growth scale. All of the other factors should help in improving the goodness of the people, else their achievements will not The assertion stated here is a contentious issue and needs a scrupulous and cogent analysis and a lucid delineation.
To begin with, a nation even though it is well developed in science and technology, making tremendous progress in the science realm, it is not necessary to be a good place for its individuals to live. For instance, North Korea is a country that is very progressive in terms of research and development. They have done much nuclear research and testing, powerful pieces of equipment to safeguard their country. Inspire of being this powerful in scientific advancement, still, it is not considered as a great nation as North Korean citizens are struggling with poverty, and a myriad of children are suffering from malnutrition and the country is losing many lives due to hunger and penury.
Furthermore, to be a well-developed nation, albeit the country’s economy, scientific development are boosted, there is a huge gap between the average people's income and the income of opulence. India is a great example of this. A recent study says that the chairman of Reliance group of industries Mr. Ambani pays the tax that constitutes 2% of India’s total taxes. There are many industrialists, entrepreneurs are from India, politicians who are rich, the economy is also moving at a faster rate, still, there are many areas in which the average income is below the poverty range thus impeding the growth of the nation.
However, there are few countries which exempt from this. Nevertheless, the people of a country are wealthy, development of science and technology is also significant in making a country powerful. To exemplify this, Saudi Arabia is a country in which the people are prosperous, still, it is not considered a great nation because of the slow progress in science and research. To be a great nation, breakthroughs in science and technology should help people live a prosperous life, and the efficiency of leaders, rulers, and artists are not the main factor but still give a certain contribution to the proficiency of the country.
To put this elucidation in a nutshell, the outline of the claim seems inappreciable at the first glance, but after meticulous dissection of the sentence, it is clear that the true factor to gauge a nation’s development is the betterment of its citizens and any achievements in science, arts or the leader should help ameliorate the welfare of the people in order to become an indicator of a great nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 433, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
... truly progressing on the growth scale. All of the other factors should help in improving ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people, else their achievements will not The assertion stated here is a contentio...
^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...there is a huge gap between the average peoples income and the income of opulence. Indi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Mr. Ambani pays the tax that constitutes 2% of India’s total taxes. There are man...
^^
Line 5, column 622, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thus impeding the growth of the nation. However, there are few countries which e...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n to the proficiency of the country. To put this elucidation in a nutshell, the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, then, thus, well, for instance, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 38.0 19.5258426966 195% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2522.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 502.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02390438247 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97464990993 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486055776892 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 787.5 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.9609292929 60.3974514979 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.625 118.986275619 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.375 23.4991977007 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 5.21951772744 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168480623959 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052656118926 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544241802553 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100691154564 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474937232699 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.