The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The argument that the surest indicator of a great nation is represented by the general welfare of its people, not by the achievements of its ruler, artists, or scientists may have considerable merits. However, “welfare” is not an extremely good indicator which requires to be specific. Furthermore, welfare of people and achievement of governor and so on are not mutually exclusive; thus, I only partially agree with the statement.
Admittedly, people are the most important part of a nation which is just a creature of human to protect themselves. Logically speaking, we can definitely claim that the welfare of people is a prerequisite of good nation.
Nevertheless, when we speak of “welfare”, the following come to our mind: health, wealth, happiness, and freedom. Thus, it is too complicate to be a proper indicator. If we want to institute a sufficient indicator, this might be a set of indicators, rather than an individual one.
Additionally, achievements of governors, artists, scientists can result in advance of society and promotion of human’s welfare in many circumstances. Hence, these achievements can be one of many indicators to measure the greatness of a nation. For example, the advent of national health insurance which is a significant achievement of last president in my country helps many poor people to get appropriate health care.
To sum up, the welfare of people is the most important element of a good nation, however, not a good enough indicator for its complexity. Instead, a proper indicator is a set of indicators includes more specific measurements of people’s welfare and achievements of governors, artists, scientists.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-01 | student193044 | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Jhon Kwame | 50 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 50
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero 50
- 15 The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impa 48
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to complicate'?
Suggestion: to complicate
...th, happiness, and freedom. Thus, it is too complicate to be a proper indicator. If we want to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'complicated'.
Suggestion: complicated
...happiness, and freedom. Thus, it is too complicate to be a proper indicator. If we want to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 264.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36363636364 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34446316833 2.79657885939 120% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549242424242 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1270066889 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333378032378 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11392193537 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918079603748 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184824917567 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13355275504 0.0667264976115 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.