Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is highly debatable whether the rules that societies expect youths to follow and obey are too strict in the present. The issue can be approached from several angle: comparing and real situations. After deliberating this argument from these aspects, I contend the opposite that the rules aren't strict now.
On one hand, comparing to the past, the rules obligate young people to obey are far looser nowadays. In the past, the rules about genders, age, and relationship were concrete. Everyone should act as their social roles. Take the old customs in my country for example to elaborate this idea. Ladies, especially unmarried girls, couldn't go out without covering their face. Young people could get promotion in their jobs only if the older had promoted. The younger generation should respect the elder no matter what they did. However, as time elapse, all of these rules have been viewed old-fashioned in modern society.
On the other hand, the rules nowadays can’t be rigorous due to the development of technology. The advent of the Internet remake the relationship and rules between humans in that the distance among people is widened. Now people can work from home, make friends from websites, and even live without leaving their houses. This distance makes people's relation changeable, and further make rules loose for two main reasons. Firstly, because of the anonymity on the Internet, societies hardly enforce rules which are expected youth to follow. Secondly, even if the rules are enforced, young people could cut the relations and neglect these rules easily.
Accordingly, modern young people have more freedom as the rules expected them to obey are loose. Youths are more likely to do what they want, and whatever they like. For instance, girls can go out dressing whatever they want. Both young female and male can get promotion just because of their achievement, but not their ages. The judgments of right or wrong are based on facts and law, but no longer generation.
In sum, with the reasons and examples I mention above, the rules in the past are far more rigorous, the technology development enable young people to eschew rules, and people have more freedom nowadays, I believe that the rules that obligate youths to follow are loose in this modern society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun angle seems to be countable; consider using: 'several angles'.
Suggestion: several angles
...esent. The issue can be approached from several angle: comparing and real situations. After d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
..., I contend the opposite that the rules arent strict now. On one hand, comparing t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ea. Ladies, especially unmarried girls, couldnt go out without covering their face. You...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tions and neglect these rules easily. Accordingly, modern young people have mo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07671957672 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41943185763 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7753617453 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4347826087 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4347826087 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91304347826 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24446855705 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665244058145 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769868367214 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145318646304 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448914070379 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.