The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
The author says that a nation is as a great nation when it is indicated by the general welfare of the people and not by the contribution of the scientists, artists and rulers.However, I do not agree with this idea. I feel that the rulers, scientists and artists are the people who define the nation. And their contribution surely make the nation proud.
To bolster this, we can state that nuclear weapons and other artilleries have much importance in the current world which make nations like U.S.A. and Russia so powerful and dominant in the enitre world. As these nations are way ahead in the field of arillery technology, they are treated to be superiors and have more rights over various opportunities.Other developing nations look up to these nations and consider them as role models. And also they have their veto powers because of their dominance in the field of weapons.
Another great example is that of rulers. when the rulers are famous, that was generally for how well they governed their state. The rulers were known for their intelligence on how to keep the enemies at a bay, keep the citizens satisfied, and how with minimum loses and war, they could conquer more area. All these things helped the nation to become a great nation. Although the citizens may have some slight glitch with the authorities, still overall the nation used to work efficiently.
Also, we have great artists like Michael Jackson and Lata Mangeshkar, by whom people across world recognize U.S.A. and India . Had they been not so famous in their respective fields, the nations would not have been recognized and considered great to have produced such precious talents.
But on the contrary, we have the example of Japan. This country invested heavily on its people. The country helped to make its citizen strong and educated which helped to make the country strong. And thus they could comeback as a strong and developed nation. Here it was the joint efforts of the denizens that helped to make their country great.
Also, the rulers, scientists and artists of any country are also the citizens or people of that nation. So, their contribution to make a country great should not be treated differently. thus the scientists, artists and rulers make the country great.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...n of the scientists, artists and rulers.However, I do not agree with this idea. I feel ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Other
... more rights over various opportunities.Other developing nations look up to these nat...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...nother great example is that of rulers. when the rulers are famous, that was general...
^^^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... across world recognize U.S.A. and India . Had they been not so famous in their re...
^^
Line 9, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...try strong. And thus they could comeback as a strong and developed nation. Here i...
^^
Line 11, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...reat should not be treated differently. thus the scientists, artists and rulers make...
^^^^
Line 11, column 187, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
...reat should not be treated differently. thus the scientists, artists and rulers make...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, still, thus, well, i feel, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92428198433 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56092749007 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480417754569 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.6851110439 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8095238095 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2380952381 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212208043905 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733956672812 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664109148872 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115243591891 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626581252597 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.