Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The world that we live in today is a materialistic world. Each one of us is motivated by higher incentives. In private organizations, the employees always try to give in their best performance due to monetary incentives. Henceforth, correlating a teacher's salary with academic performance of the students might actually help in improving the academic performance of the students.
In today's scenario, money plays a significant role in each of our lives. Money gives us this purchasing power which helps us meet our needs and demands. Hence, it would be natural for everyone to try to earn as much money as possible as they can fulfill more of their desires. Thus, going by this common notion, if teacher's salary is linked to the student's performance in academics, the teachers might actually put in more effort to help students improve their performance.
If we look carefully into the human behaviour, we always try to put in more effort when we see there is a possibility of higher amount of incentives. Consequently, this human behaviour is universal and applicable everywhere. A teacher when he sees that his students are not performing academically well, there is a very high possibility that he might not be even concerned with it because he will not be getting any extra incentives for his additional effort. Whereas, when he finds that on helping students improve their performance, he will be getting additional incentives, he will definitely try to put in more of his effort. Additionally, leaving the monetary benefits aside, he will feel a sense of satisfaction of helping his students improve their grades. Thus, it is very much evident that the academic performance of the students can be improved by offering additional incentives to the teachers.
On the contrary, there is a downfall to this as well. Some teachers might use methods that helps in securing good grades but not learning. The teacher might end up giving a load of assignments and teach the students the very specific topics which are important from examination point of view. Thus, indirectly the teacher will try to promote rote learning over actual learning, which is detrimental for students on the long run, as they will not understand the logic of the topic. However, this problem may be curbed by setting up standardised tests for students, which would determine the students academic performance. By setting up standardised tests, the teachers will try to promote actual learning over rote learning.
Thus, in a nutshell, we can definitely see the advantage of linking the teacher's salary to the academic performance of the students. However, there might be some downsides to this as well. But, taking some additional measures will help curb this.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...y incentives. Henceforth, correlating a teachers salary with academic performance of the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...on, if teachers salary is linked to the students performance in academics, the teachers ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 73, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...nitely see the advantage of linking the teachers salary to the academic performance of t...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'consequently', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'whereas', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.198 0.240241500013 82% => OK
Verbs: 0.164 0.157235817809 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.088 0.0880659088768 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.064 0.0497285424764 129% => OK
Pronouns: 0.062 0.0444667217837 139% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.116 0.12292977631 94% => OK
Participles: 0.048 0.0406280797675 118% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.92943849168 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.028 0.030933414821 91% => OK
Particles: 0.006 0.0016655270985 360% => OK
Determiners: 0.098 0.0997080785238 98% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.04 0.0249443105267 160% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.016 0.0148568991511 108% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2745.0 2732.02544248 100% => OK
No of words: 450.0 452.878318584 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.355555555556 0.366273622748 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.297777777778 0.280924506359 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.237777777778 0.200843997647 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.146666666667 0.132149295362 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92943849168 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 219.290929204 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442222222222 0.48968727796 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.7328824597 55.4138127331 88% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.5652173913 23.380412469 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8396047037 59.4972553346 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.347826087 141.124799967 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5652173913 23.380412469 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.565217391304 0.674092028746 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 49.3429951691 51.4728631049 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.24827586207 1.64882698954 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388750816407 0.391690518653 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.137829444263 0.123202303941 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.114744587045 0.077325440228 148% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.475243395712 0.547984918172 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.142295428019 0.149214159877 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145582377309 0.161403998019 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109424558434 0.0892212321368 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.355797387671 0.385218514788 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0639065792253 0.0692045440612 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28467061398 0.275328986314 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538136090182 0.0653680567796 82% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.4325221239 192% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 18.0 7.22455752212 249% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.5995575221 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.