Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Teaching profession is one of the most important profession in any country. Teachers are the one who produces future stars, good human being, real hero for their nation by introducing their skill to their students. For expecting a developed nation teachers should be given highest priority as well as their salaries should be commensurated by realizing their responsibilities. That's why i completely disagree with the statement that their salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students.
Firstly, teaching profession is regarded as the most respected job all over the world. It is said that, if anyone learns any tiny amount of knowledge in his life from anyone, he should consider or respect him as a teacher. They utilize their complete responsibilities for developing their students skill. For doing that, they do not expect any return from their students as financial income. School, College are considered as the factory of building good human being which will come to use of the nation in future. Departing from that factory they joined their intended jobs, where they contribute for their country. But in their certain job, whether they will be honest or not, does not depend on their teachers. It is their responsibilities to utilize their knowledge got from their school college correctively.
Next, teachers do their best for teaching their students. They use their complete inherent knowledge teaching them. But the knowledge that they distribute should be acquired by the student himself. It is his own responsibility to study them hard and show good results in exam. If he doesnot study well, he is sure not to do well in exam. Nobody is reponsible for that bad result without him himself. He is does well in exam by hooks or crooks, in the long run he is sure to suffer a lot. In future, in any reputed job he will surely try to do any task in legal or illegal way, in which way it comes faster. This nature is not found in a good human being.
Furthermore, if a student does well in exam, get recognized all over the world for his result, that does not mean that his teacher should be given highest salary for his student's reult. Because, the knowledge that a student got from his teacher, by utilizing that knowledge completely he cam to this stage. He studied hard, was consistent in his daily routine, for this he is able to get that recognition. Here, the full credit absolutely goes to himself. Yeah, the push he got from his teacher at early life, ofcourse means a lot but that doenot mean that that teacher's salary should be increased as well as his students getting good performance.
In conclusion, it can be said that, student's academic performance completely depends upon the student himself. It is his complete duty to utilize the gatherings he got from his teacher. No teacher show any frugality in distributing his inherent knowledge. It is his students responsibility, how they absorb those. So, students' academic resluts do not play any role determining the salaries their teachers. Teachers should be paid by their own skill, own qualification.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'given the highest'.
Suggestion: given the highest
...g a developed nation teachers should be given highest priority as well as their salaries shou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ed by realizing their responsibilities. Thats why i completely disagree with the stat...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ng which will come to use of the nation in future. Departing from that factory they joine...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
...he long run he is sure to suffer a lot. In future, in any reputed job he will surely try ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'given the highest'.
Suggestion: given the highest
...oes not mean that his teacher should be given highest salary for his students reult. Because,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 564, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ns a lot but that doenot mean that that teachers salary should be increased as well as ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 602, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t teachers salary should be increased as well as his students getting good perfor...
^^
Line 9, column 200, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'shows'.
Suggestion: shows
...ngs he got from his teacher. No teacher show any frugality in distributing his inher...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 89.0 33.0505617978 269% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2594.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 524.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95038167939 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7844588288 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76937461977 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446564885496 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 781.2 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8988799796 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0625 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28125 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223641587823 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698408177949 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638774394178 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150619838673 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530050293199 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.