Teachers salaries should be based on the academic performances of their students.
The statement states that the salaries of the teachers should be based on the performances of the students they teach and it should not be fixed salaries. Using such an idea would not be proper to evaluate the teachers. As the students might be different in each class and may be biased to the particular subject that might could be affected on the salaries of the teacher.
Firstly in many schools there is division system in which according to level of the students they are bifurcated ,suppose A,B,C in which students are differentiated according to their merits. If the students of A class performs good then the teacher of the class A is paid well and others are not. If the idea stated in statement is followed it may be the case no teacher would be ready to teach students of the class with lower merits. How can a class in which there are variety of students few intelligent, few are blithe and few are average can decide the cost of the teachers efforts. And the result is always gone be average as some might be inviting or some might be not happy with it. so result will always be average or some times above average. so choosing idea of fixing salaries on the basis of the performances may be unjust for the faculties.
Secondly evaluation of the students score is in the hand of the teachers. So if the policy of salaries on the basis of the academic performances is adopted then it might be case that teachers start taking out easier papers for students or awarding the students more marks compared to they have earned with respect to their writing. It might increase corruption in the system as the teachers are trying to give marks illicitly to increase their pay. There can be case that in some recondite subject like say geo chemistry students might not get like involved, though the teaching of the faculty is the best or the faculty has given wholesome efforts. Then using the above idea would be injustice to the teacher as she has not in the fault in the case when the subject not liked by the students.
One more better method that can be adopted by the educational institutes is they can give incentives to the teachers on basis of the performances of the students. suppose teachers in the class has X amount of the fixed salary then on basis of the performances they are awarded incentives according to the performances and efforts of the students in that particular subject. Using such may they can get inspired or motivated to make some more efforts to improve the performances of the students who are below average and at least by assisting them they can be leveled up to the average.
Hence using above reason it shows that applying the idea according to the statement is not recommendable as there are many demerits of it and using it is not justified.As in many case the performances of the students would not be properly evaluated as teachers can try increasing the grades by using deceptive methods. Instead of it using incentive based schemes would be a better choice or alternative would be considered better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...evel of the students they are bifurcated ,suppose A,B,C in which students are diff...
^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , B
... students they are bifurcated ,suppose A,B,C in which students are differentiated ...
^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lass A is paid well and others are not. If the idea stated in statement is followe...
^^
Line 3, column 755, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...be average or some times above average. so choosing idea of fixing salaries on the...
^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Suppose
...is of the performances of the students. suppose teachers in the class has X amount of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ey can be leveled up to the average. Hence using above reason it shows that applyi...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 169, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...its of it and using it is not justified.As in many case the performances of the st...
^^
Line 9, column 175, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun case seems to be countable; consider using: 'many cases'.
Suggestion: many cases
... it and using it is not justified.As in many case the performances of the students would ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, at least, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 41.0 19.5258426966 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 29.0 12.4196629213 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2517.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 540.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66111111111 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60116242349 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.366666666667 0.4932671777 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 804.6 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0971723245 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.85 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365656712326 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126266380855 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976962324423 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229919036072 0.150359130593 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822051211854 0.0667264976115 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.