Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Teachers’ salaries should not be based on their students’ academic performance. The idea that teachers’ salaries should be based on their students’ academic performance is irrational and unjust to the teachers because some students find some subjects like physics and mathematics difficult to comprehend, this is not totally the fault of the teacher, some student even have terrible attitude towards education.
Firstly, subjects like physics and mathematics that students find difficult to comprehend and have poor performance in, even though the teachers are putting in their best to pass the knowledge unto the students. It will be irrational and unjust for such subject teachers to be paid based on the poor academic performance of the students, forgetting the fact that the teachers did their best as teachers. Likewise, there are subjects that are easy to understand, even without the teachers doing much of a work, that doesn’t mean they should be paid more.
Secondly, teachers didn’t go through the stress of going to college to get Bachelor’s degree and sometime Masters or PhD to become a teacher for their salaries to be decided by their students who has refused to pass. There are some students who makes teaching difficult for teachers, where I come from we call the NFA (No Future Ambition), they are also known to be back sitters of the class. It will be unfair for the teachers’ salaries to be decided by these set of students.
However, one may argue that teachers will put in more effort if their salaries are decided by the students’ academic performance but putting into consideration the set of NFA mentioned earlier, who has made up their mind not to pass a subject. The teachers’ fate should not be left in such hands.
In conclusion, with the above reasons the teachers’ salaries should not be based on students’ academic performance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on students' academic performance.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, may, second, secondly, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 308.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09998803038 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480519480519 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.8116281222 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.636363636 118.986275619 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 5.21951772744 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352668188918 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205238725356 0.0831039109588 247% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128128626521 0.0758088955206 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266952838375 0.150359130593 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889251164969 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.