technology
In today's world, every single thing that we want is just one click of a button away. Food clothes, transport, electronics, you name it. But this could not possible if the technologies that we have are not in existence. So technology plays a vital role in daily life, without it one could barely imagine one's life. Humans life have been changed so dramatically. It can be easily seen from our daily life that how technology revolutionized our life. From going to office by car to the usage of elevators instead of stairs. You can easily reach out to your family and friends when you are not at home.
The assumption that the ability of humans to think about themselves will surely deteriorate might not hold true because if look back at the introduction, one could argue that how one should travel to the office without a car or by any other vehicle. How one would complete his work without a computer or connect with one's family. Yes, we have an alternative for all these mentions above, but my question is, are they as productive as technologies make things productive in terms of output. Answer is no, because in today world if you are trying to connect with someone with the help of methods that were used early, then it makes no sense as we are living in the century where you can connect with anybody at any corner of world within few seconds, you don't have to wait for days in sending your message to them.
However everything has bad side technology too has a bad side, because nowadays humans are completely dependent on technology for most of the work they do. From switching off the fan with remote to do a basic calculation with the help of a calculator. Technology not only tackles with the problems that we face but also create some problem, for example, as mentioned in the first paragraph that we are using a car for going to the office but this also leads to the global warming. And we are still trying to figure out the solution to this problem.
So ya every coin has two faces, technology has too. But as compared to the bad sides of technology, we have a much more positive side. Technology frees the human to think, not only think but also providing the platform to implement them. For example, we are using Facebook but was it possible to develop or use Facebook without the internet. And if you want to retrieve any information or data, you can easily search it on any search engine which you like to use. So we can say technology has obsolete problems.
In the end, we can say that technology is the medicine for the problem that we were facing earlier. Though it has created some problems for us, however, it also teaches us how to tackle them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ssible if the technologies that we have are not in existence. So technology plays a...
^^^
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...fe, without it one could barely imagine ones life. Humans life have been changed so ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...work without a computer or connect with ones family. Yes, we have an alternative for...
^^^^
Line 5, column 754, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...corner of world within few seconds, you dont have to wait for days in sending your m...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...in sending your message to them. However everything has bad side technology too ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, still, then, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2213.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57231404959 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46922437589 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502066115702 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8084819756 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2083333333 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238680410644 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885509489185 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111342417047 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158505400204 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611302291097 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.