Technology and the human activity that goes with it inevitably leads to greater pollution and environmental damage.
The issue of whether technology and the human activity leads to greater pollution is a contentious one. While each side has its strengths and weaknesses, I believe that technology and human activity leads to greater pollution, because the technological advancement has lead to disturb the natural cycle, which leads to extinction of many animals. Furthermore, human activities has not only put animals at risk but humans also.
First, technological progress, such as cars, AC's, etc, has been one of the main reasons to disturb the natural cycle. for instance, cars and AC's release a large amount of green house gases, which alters the temperature of the earth. Due to these gases, Global warming is taking place, leading to increase of pollutants in the air. Furthermore, leading to many extinctions of birds and animals, which in turn disturbs the animal cycle.Due to these pollutants in the air , many people are facing breathing problems. So given the effects of technological progress, inevitably the world leads to greater pollution and environmental damage.
Moreover, the waste produced from human activities has a deleterious effect on the environment. For instance, industries releasing the wastes in rivers and oceans have affected the aqua life <system, More fishes are endangered because of the pollution in the water. Plastics in the ocean is one of the main reasons for many fish's deaths. Due to global warming, oceans are absorbing the heat and resulting in higher temperature in water. So, the human activities affect the nature both directly and indirectly.
finally, many people for their own purposes cut the forests resulting in damage of many species of the forest. Due to deforestation, many animals are losing their home, frequency of natural disasters, such as floods or Drought, increases.
In conclusion, technology produces wastes that harms both animals and humans, wastes from human activities is deleterious for many water animals. For these reasons, Human activities and technology will inevitably lead to increase in pollution and nature damage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 422, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...not only put animals at risk but humans also. First, technological progress, such...
^^^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...n reasons to disturb the natural cycle. for instance, cars and ACs release a large ...
^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Due
...which in turn disturbs the animal cycle.Due to these pollutants in the air , many p...
^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cycle.Due to these pollutants in the air , many people are facing breathing proble...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...nature both directly and indirectly. finally, many people for their own purposes cu...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally, many people for their own purposes cut the forests resulting in damage of m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 33.0505617978 27% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38837920489 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87002161887 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51376146789 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1823361251 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.647058824 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366390291529 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131571298305 0.0831039109588 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130906703319 0.0758088955206 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208700042509 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13072936704 0.0667264976115 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.