Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
Technology has been rapidly progressing at a pace previous unknown. The statement may give rise to ambivalent thoughts among many people. The statement in short mentions that, even though technology has been aimed at making human life more simple may inconsequentially end up making life more complex, which I disagree with. There are several reasons to take this stand, which will be explained in the following paragraphs.
A very good example to show that technology actually makes our life easy is seeing how much simpler life has been made with the advent of washing machines and dishwashers. Now, we don't need to spend the energy and time to wash our clothes and dishes, which has made life simpler.
Then we move to the world of smartphones, tablets, desktop computers and see how technology has actually made human life simpler. Now we have applications and software that actually help us in every part of our life. Want to track your calories? There is an application for that. Want to learn how to meditate? There's an application for that too as well.
For an end to end communication in corporations, we have electronic mails that make our task of communication very easy. Before that, we had to send letters and telegrams which were clearly not as fast as currently employed techniques of emails.
However, the flip side is that technology can be quite expensive and may require additional training/learning which may have made life a tad bit complicated. To illustrate, consider the latest high-end laptops. Even though such laptops can be useful to a certain few, they can be quite exorbitant. Additionally, users require medium to intense training for efficient use. Also, now with all the options available to the end-user, it sometimes becomes very difficult to choose the most optimized option.
To conclude, although, certain aspects of technology make our lives complicated, most of them make it easy and hassle-free by optimizing our time and energy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...shing machines and dishwashers. Now, we dont need to spend the energy and time to wa...
^^^^
Line 9, column 312, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: There's
...or that. Want to learn how to meditate? Theres an application for that too as well. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, may, so, then, well, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 325.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14153846154 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91162778036 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587692307692 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3583150038 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.55 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15467519423 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391912901006 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692368070016 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977952958164 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869225092381 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.