In their eagerness to address the issue of technological and economical development, governments, all over the world, are losing sight over the development and growth of human beings.
The world nowadays, is developing rapidly and its prominent field is technology which further stabilizes the economics related to it. The major benefit from it is to the common public who make use of it to make their lives convenient. This technological development is affecting each and every person on the world no matter how off disinterested the person be.
This being the reason, the governments are boasting their specific county's development in this field neglecting the genuine attempts made in other field. Along with technology, many other fields are also developing which are often not given the credit or the value they deserve. For example, the development in humans as their morals and their intellect is advancing is not noticed than much. There can be an explainable reason for it. The results from development are far more advanced than the results one obtain in other field. The governments that has been talked about in the issue is justified as the broadcasting of developments in economy and technology gives them huge benefit over other countries in their rankings. This being the main reason, the governments promote people tho invest in the start-ups which would help the country stand independently and flourish in the technological department.
Any country's development is calculated according to the income it generates and the life style of their citizens. Due to this also, the government give development in economic field more preference. But it is a good policy to aim for technological and economic development as it not only helps the country to make a stand internationally but it also improves the life styles of their citizens. For example, if a country is technologically ahead of others then that country is bound to be at the top as it will allow the natives to live luxuriously and will depict both development of human being and economic growth.
This being said, there is nothing wrong in giving development in technology and economy more preference over growth of human beings as it will be fortuitous result. Ultimately, the growth in human beings is neglected as most of the resources and attention is given to these fields.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 358.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09497206704 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9326150368 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508379888268 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7698044567 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232554385755 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830006423054 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521487472073 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152709476505 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0084018762089 0.0667264976115 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.