With the development of simulation technology, should live experimentation on animals be considered not necessary any more?
Research is the way one satisfies his/her curiosity. Also with that being, the development done is a primary benefit. The issue in debate is whether we should keep on practicing the orthodox methods of testing of our research on live animals. As it is stated, the technology is far more advanced than ever. In today's world, we can do number of things that we were not able to do yet with the help of technology.
Creating a simulation of future events is an example of it. This simulation foresees the events that are yet to happen and giving a prediction based on the previous results. In earlier days researchers doing their work in biology use to work on animals like rats and pigs for their experimentation. This above stated method of carrying out research is now considered illegal in some nations due to the ill effects occurring in the dummies. And it should also not be a justified act anymore. The reason being the amount of torment given to these animals render them with life of depression. Studies say that their life activities like hunting for food is vastly affected.
Also another reason to bring an abeyance to this practice is the animals after experimentation are left in the wild to observe and collect data for their heinous deed. This risks the whole of the wild with which they interact and can be a reason for extinction of that species in that region. The simulation technology helps in creating a safe environment for researchers to carry out their experiment without any danger to the animals as they are not involved in it. Instead experiments are done virtually on them in simulated environment. If one has this facility then one should surely use it. There are reasons to not use it as researchers are not inclined to it or find it complex or they do not have the funds for it.
But as some orthodox researchers do not believe on the reliability of machines they prefer the conventional way of conducting them on live animals instead. Now the reason behind this might be that many biologists have found cure of diseases by experimenting on live animals and sometimes even on humans. The polio vaccine was found only after the experimentation on hundrends of animals and only after deaths of a lot of humans. This stated one can say that live experimentation on animals should be made illegal in all nations. The stubborn researchers should be persuaded towards using simulations which do not harm the lives of any living entity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...he way one satisfies his/her curiosity. Also with that being, the development done i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...researchers doing their work in biology use to work on animals like rats and pigs f...
^^^
Line 5, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...unting for food is vastly affected. Also another reason to bring an abeyance to ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...animals as they are not involved in it. Instead experiments are done virtually on them ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 543, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ually on them in simulated environment. If one has this facility then one should s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77336448598 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7607955548 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488317757009 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2694678325 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8260869565 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6086956522 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.21951772744 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310467639667 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808179843161 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631399150993 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178238020443 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649090951234 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.