There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsiblity to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws.
Societies are made up of people and comprises of rules and regulations which has to be followed by every individual who resides in the society. There may be some rules or regulations that are deleterious to society. Individulas in the society should take stand against such unjust or biased rules.
Furthermore it is incumbent on individuals or members of a society to take a defnitive stand when the some sections of laws are not benefitting them. Such type of unjust laws are being implemented in tyrannical or autocratic state. For instance Adolf Hitler, the dictator of Germany who created havoc in the world has targeted Jews for his own benefit. He sanctioned laws that were against the well-being of Jews. He ordered to eradicate Jews from the society and for that purpose he build concentration camps. These laws were against a particular section of a society. Citizens of Germany should have anticipated the nature of Hitler and should not have entertained such laws.
Individuals should take action against these unjust laws only when his or her action are beneficial for whole section of a society. His action against unjust laws should not benefit only him. For examples, British has implemented lot of unjust laws on colonized Indians. Mahatma Gandhi and several other politicians stood against these laws which were detrimental for whole section of society.
Sometimes laws are created for the betterment of a society which may not be liked by individual section of a society. They opposes or willing to take action against such laws ignoring the rest members of a society. For instance Population in china was burgeoning in the 1970s era. Chineese government enacted one child policy to curb population growth. This law may not be liked by individuals as it attacks on privacy of couples. But in the long run China has controlled its population growth.
In conclusion, individual or members of a society should take action against unjust laws only when such unjust laws impacts whole society. Society members should figure out which unjust laws are for the betterment of whole society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
Societies are made up of people and comprises of rules and regulations which has to be f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...against such unjust or biased rules. Furthermore it is incumbent on individuals or membe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...iety to take a defnitive stand when the some sections of laws are not benefitting th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'eradicating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'order' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: eradicating
...inst the well-being of Jews. He ordered to eradicate Jews from the society and for that purp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'builds'.
Suggestion: builds
...rom the society and for that purpose he build concentration camps. These laws were ag...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lemented lot of unjust laws on colonized Indians. Mahatma Gandhi and several othe...
^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'oppose'
Suggestion: oppose
...y individual section of a society. They opposes or willing to take action against such ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, may, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 347.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08933717579 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7057157906 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438040345821 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.831084006 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.2727272727 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7727272727 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183122285536 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662091292211 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553526468303 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124497676303 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432594915201 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.