There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Human society was built before prehistory, they made a family, village, and nation. Human in that era ate wild animals, plants when they were hungry. Further, human society develops skills such as agriculture, industry, and technology and there are about two hundred and twenty nations around the world. Some nations are developed nation, whereas other nation is still developing. The statement claims that society should have little justification to make great cost in money on the endangered animals and plants. Given statement claim, we as human doesn’t need to make justification on the great cost on the money and job to protect endangered animal or plant species because great cost would affect our society to use others. However, society should have great responsibility on making great cost in money to protect endangered animal, and plant species. Endangered animals and plants are not used to be endangered; they were living in contemporary situation when human species made a family, village, and nation. There are negative effects to these species after human society develops; when people had agriculture, industrialization, technological development, all these effects influence to enfeeble animal and plant’s viability. Food chain will be devastated because of contamination from these development. Eventually, all of the causes will come to human.
First and foremost, society should make justification to have great money cost to preserve animal and plant species because food chain devastation. Wild animal and plant species are basically interrelated to each other and biological system keep balanced in that relation. However, as soon as there is no more bottom line of food chain such as herbivores or essential plants, then carnivores could not survive. Eventually, this will affect highest top food chain, human society. Consider it is not only the fact that we are going to be one but also it will keep influencing our descendent.
Additionally, endangered species were not meant to be endangered, which means there is a cause from phenomena. This phenomena was come from human; as human society has developed from agriculture to industrialization, our mother nature has been suffered from problems. Problem is us, we made a great history, but we caused dilapidated situation where we belong to.
Opponent to the concern might be great money cost and jobs. The great cost in money will affect society to other usage and the circulation of money, economy system would have negative effect from this situation. However, when we reconsider what we have to do with this specific problem, the result is simple. If we do not deal with preserving endangered animal and plants species, future cost will be inconceivable price to harness the control, maybe it is too late to protect any endangered species.
In closing, we are living in a complex world and this specific problem is the part of controversial issues. The great cost may hold the proponents of protection of endangered species, but when in consideration, we made contamination, food chain devastation because of our development. We should not overshadow on this problem, but we should confront to preserve any endangered species no matter the cost is.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1306, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this development' or 'these developments'?
Suggestion: this development; these developments
...evastated because of contamination from these development. Eventually, all of the causes will com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1337, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ion from these development. Eventually, all of the causes will come to human. First an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'affect the highest'.
Suggestion: affect the highest
...ould not survive. Eventually, this will affect highest top food chain, human society. Consider...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
... means there is a cause from phenomena. This phenomena was come from human; as human...
^^^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[5]
Message: You should probably use: 'were'.
Suggestion: were
... a cause from phenomena. This phenomena was come from human; as human society has d...
^^^
Line 4, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lapidated situation where we belong to. Opponent to the concern might be great m...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, then, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2739.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 514.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32879377432 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96525180801 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451361867704 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 866.7 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1362947397 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.346153846 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.65384615385 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218369491771 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714103538217 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844713090915 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121483611827 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603420733719 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.