There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endangered animal or plant species Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statem

Essay topics:

There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The environment of the globe is ever changing and one of the reasons responsible for the changes are daily activities of humans. People are building factories that sometimes do not follow the governmental regulations and as a result pollute the environment. Some believe that these types of activities have also affected the lives of several animal and plant species. Consequently, efforts are being taken by various organizations, either funded by the government or not, to save endangered species of flora and fauna. In my opinion, I mostly agree with the initiative of taking measures, sometimes at the expense of extraordinary efforts, to save the endangered species.
To begin, the overall healthy functioning of our ecosystem is dependent on the survival of all types of species. Ecosystem is defined as the interaction of different species in a certain environment to maintain the stability of the surroundings. If any of the species go extinct, then the ecosystem is greatly affected negatively. For instance, cockroaches seem to be a notorious creature that serves no purpose in the environment. However, these species are the recycle bins of the planet; they eat almost anything that is not useful for the humans. If cockroaches go extinct, then the amount of garbage laying around on the ecosystem will increase by large amounts. As a consequence, the ecosystem will be negative affected. Thus, putting efforts to save the ecosystem by taking steps to save endangered species is a noble cause.
Next, the steps taken to put extra ordinary efforts to save species creates lots of opportunities or jobs for many people. This is beneficial for persons who have not been able to support themselves due to scarcity of jobs. Therefore, the money invested in organizations to save the endangered species is justifiable.
In contrast to the benefits, some may argue that the economy of a society may be jeopardized if tremendous amounts of money is spent on saving the endangered species. Indeed, this could be possible if the government officials are not careful enough to determine and calculate the costs involved to tackle the endangered species issue. It must be the responsibility of economists working for the government to not allow the investment in affairs that may put the economy of the country at risk.
In conclusion, all species in an environment play significant role for the smooth functioning of our ecosystem. Thus, initiatives taken to save the endangered species of animals and plants should be greatly supported. Taking such measures opens jobs for various people. An extraordinary effort is sometimes required to save the imperiled species of flora and fauna.

Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 605, Rule ID: LAYING_AROUND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lying around'?
Suggestion: lying around
... go extinct, then the amount of garbage laying around on the ecosystem will increase by large...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2259.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 433.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21709006928 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03547325696 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487297921478 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7434525209 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.2173913043 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8260869565 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47826086957 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240014180232 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694946764773 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524235990117 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144093412593 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383122029156 0.0667264976115 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.