There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Industrial development marked the beginning of the twentieth century. Technology has advanced at a pace unforeseeable. This development came at a cost, for which all the species on the planet earth are paying dearly, some moer than others. The issue of saving endangered species from goinf extinct is hot button topic amongst environmentalists and scientists. The issue is a complex one and finding solution, even for the experts in the subject, is proving to be quite difficult. Some think it is better not to spend money and time to save endangered species, since it is a waste of resources.
I believe we need to handle this problem with utmost care and decide where to focus our resources. There area cases where our efforts, no matter how relentless, are fruitless.
Soon after the industrial development in the early 1900's, our impcat on the planet has increased to the point of no return. Our lives has changes significantly from that of out ancestors. Unfortunately, we damages the surroundings adn various ecological systems in them. This irreparable change in many ecological systems has put many species on the edge of extinction. For instance, the area surronding thick forests of the amazon in southern american used to be home to thousands of species. However, due to human intervention in habitat of these species, they have gone extinct. Their extinction in trun has hurt the local economies. These local economies, in turn, switched to the alternate occupations. The above example illustrates that many species are going extict becasue of our actions. Therefore is our duty to help them, irrespective of the cost.
However, even though it is our duty to help these species from going extict, we must set the limit on how much resources are we going to spend. For instance, white sumatran rhino is an endangerd species found in Indonesian forests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'damage'
Suggestion: damage
...hat of out ancestors. Unfortunately, we damages the surroundings adn various ecological...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 798, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...re going extict becasue of our actions. Therefore is our duty to help them, irrespective ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 107, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ng extict, we must set the limit on how much resources are we going to spend. For in...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 308.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08116883117 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90568816239 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3580632824 60.3974514979 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.25 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0915389903783 0.243740707755 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254422227251 0.0831039109588 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348322848239 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.05176966429 0.150359130593 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542015678008 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.