Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may
express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with
the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might
not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Here the statement says,” without the criticism of others for the given idea, have a lasting legacy.”
I don’t agree with the statements fully. Several reasons give the disagreement with that.
Firstly, an idea may be bad but the entire hierarchy really likes the idea. When people go with this idea outside, they will be criticized. But they don’t give up the idea because they enamored with the idea. So criticism really doesn’t help to eradicate ideas they possessed.
Another factor is that the idea is good or bad, deserve praise or criticism, vary with person to person and place to place. So one might say that this idea is very nasty but this is the suitable one for the whole generation as a whole. What really is necessary, is fully dependent on the idea of who possessed it. Thus, Criticism doesn’t make sense if the idea is really useful for the whole generation.
If the idea is very much innovative then no one can deny or criticism doesn’t really suppress the idea. It is the one which is very much helpful and already convinced people and become so handy. Think about Newton’s theory of motion, when Einstein said, there is some flaw in the theory then no one said we should discard the idea. Rather we will take the idea of new and place it side by side. Thus, Criticism doesn’t help in this respect.
Last but not least, the idea itself is a valuable resource whether is it criticized or not, its value won’t be degraded or vanished. If it is good, then it will persist. If it is bad, then it will undergo without criticism.
Thus, the persistence or legacy of an idea or survival doesn’t depend on criticism.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
Here the statement says,” without the criticism of others for the...
^
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...r the given idea, have a lasting legacy.” I don’t agree with the statements ful...
^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...no one said we should discard the idea. Rather we will take the idea of new and place ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'sides'?
Suggestion: sides
... will take the idea of new and place it side by side. Thus, Criticism doesn’t help i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, really, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 58.6224719101 39% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 292.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67808219178 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44252760007 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52397260274 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3666666191 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.8947368421 118.986275619 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3684210526 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.73684210526 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178331718914 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058070601524 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384833256248 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931066932858 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280825784329 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 14.1392134831 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.27 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.