Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
As the popular saying goes "Where there is will, there is a way". This holds still with any situation regardless of the circumstances and consequences of that situation. The prompts says that people who see their ideas through and work for them, without paying heed to what other people are criticising them about and also with a strong mind set steeled to work for something which can seem impossible for others. I completely agree with the prompt because of three main reasons.
Firstly, people always thrive and are fecund when there is a firm decision that they've made for themselves to either prove to themselves or to others. This leads to innovation, which is the most important aspect of humanity. Without innovation the human evolution is impossible. As it is evident that today's world is so technologically advanced that there are copulous amounts of problems that were faced by the humanity that were solved. For example, because of the innovative thinking of numerous talented doctors around the world who strived their way to provide vaccines to cure the Covid-19 disease, despite of the all the criticism from the world for not withstanding a stable hospital management.
Further more, not only in today's world, innovation with criticism from others, led to many wonderous break-throughs in the history as well. Such as, when Thomas Edison was critisized for his idea of illuminating the world, when Telsa was mocked by the people as he was trying to do something which led to electric cars today and many more such instances show that when people are cemented to do something without listening to others or doubting themselves they have always succeeded eventually, eventhough they went through coarse roads.
In conclusion, a lasting legacy can be left by people only when they overcone all the doubts and criticisms of the people. However, in some instances, many people tend to think that they are right in any decision even when people around them tell them that they are wrong or if they are actually fundamentally wrong. In this case, people who really want to acheive their goals can take the advices and constructive criticism of others and can still thrive at the end. As the evidences from the past show us that anything is possible when someone has determined goals, they will always achieve them and prove the others wrong. This will always stand true in the future as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'say'.
Suggestion: say
...equences of that situation. The prompts says that people who see their ideas through...
^^^^
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...cund when there is a firm decision that theyve made for themselves to either prove to ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 279, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tion the human evolution is impossible. As it is evident that todays world is so t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, however, if, really, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.3162921348 221% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2011.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97772277228 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62812429315 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532178217822 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.7172254624 60.3974514979 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.6875 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155757476233 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430968497892 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510913890608 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090227715329 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293789032421 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.