A true university education encompasses far more than the narrow, specialized study of a single discipline. Only through exploring the broad spectrum of liberal arts courses can students become truly learned.
To deal with complications of real-life, a student must undergo all-round development during school and college. They should learn about social and art-science alongside their specialized courses.
On the one hand, in my view, universities by restriction of courses to only specialized ones tend to hinder the progress of students in other important fields. Both science and liberal arts such as literature and history are necessary for mental and social progress. Depriving the students of such knowledge may lead to a devastation of morals and principles. Both pieces of knowledge are necessary for students. For example, through the literature, they can improve their literary knowledge about poetry, poets and their mother tongue. Science is necessary for the mental improvement of students. This is why I believe that teaching such courses is beneficial for students.
Furthermore, a narrow and restricted curriculum also means that a student has fewer areas to explore. Offering different courses to students in initial years of study let them decide what type of field is suitable for them. In other words, after passing some courses, such as science and art they can decide with enough deliberation for each major they tend to become more specialized.
In primary and secondary schools, students are taught superficially about different subjects. When they reach college or university, they start learning to become more specialized in special fields. I believe that they also should be taught about art and other sciences alongside the specialized study of a single discipline. In this way, students can broaden their horizons and views. Sciences such as history and literature enlighten the minds of students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rature enlighten the minds of students.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, second, so, as to, for example, of course, such as, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 268.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45149253731 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86165325771 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548507462687 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.052138318 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.9411764706 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7647058824 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196044090306 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597507855682 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428616290118 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11953611629 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386104746973 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.