A true university education encompasses far more than the narrow, specialized study of a single discipline. Only through exploring the broad spectrum of liberal arts courses can students become truly learned.
The writer of the issue assumes that a proper university education consists of more than a single kind of discipline, so if universities want students to become completely learned in a true way they should explore wide range of liberal arts lessons in their courses. I agree with this statement to some extent in a way that these kinds of courses are not suitable for every student in different fields and arts should be included indirectly for some students in some fields.
First of all, what is pivotal in determining the art courses is the field in that students want to study. For example, the university students of law and medicine have a lot of serious courses that required a lot of attention and concentration, hence university should consider some subsidiary activities for them to attend in artistic activities. For instance there should be some art galleries in the colonnades of Medicine College to help them indirectly participate in some artistic activities.
Secondly, it would be suitable for other fields which their courses are more or less related to arts to pass some liberal arts courses. For instance, architecture is a field that is amalgamate of art and engineering, so architectural students may need to revitalize their ideas through passing art lessons. Or maybe in other fields like math, students may need to learn tough lessons through creativity and providing some art courses may help them to become more creative in any aspects.
Admittedly, there are some people who disagree with this statement and say these courses which are related to art may distract students from the major field in which they are studying. They are right to some extent as I believe a wide range of these courses may distract them from the original and related courses. However, having relationship with art in any field even in their leisure time can improve the efficiency of the students as human like beauty and it can prepare their minds for main and serious courses if these lessons are prepared properly.
In conclusion, I agree that students should pass some art courses in order to revitalize their mind for the main lessons. In addition it gives them some creativity which aid them to work better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a true way" with adverb for "true"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t students to become completely learned in a true way they should explore wide range of liber...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'amalgamated'.
Suggestion: amalgamated
...stance, architecture is a field that is amalgamate of art and engineering, so architectura...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 446, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as human 'as'".
Suggestion: as
...the efficiency of the students as human like beauty and it can prepare their minds f...
^^^^
Line 9, column 126, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ize their mind for the main lessons. In addition it gives them some creativity which aid...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, of course, first of all, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97587131367 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67570529605 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434316353887 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 588.6 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8106477508 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.769230769 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6923076923 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9230769231 5.21951772744 228% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210809008156 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913445404352 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699941599361 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131795100333 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652054361655 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.