In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In this statement, the writer asserts that without learning from achievements in the earlier years, nobody can make any noteworthy contribution. I strongly agree with this assertion because learning from mistakes and earlier works is what without which achieving a great success would not be possible and they can prepare a foundation for bigger successes that we do not have readiness for.
To begin with, every work and activity when it is done for the first time is raw and full of mistakes. It is sensible in any fields from business to scientific field even simple activities in daily routine in a way that we can say experiences are the backbones of future investigations. For instance, a toddler can walk after many times falling down. In addition, today we have supercomputers which were so simple in earlier years when the inventors made them for the first time and through endeavors and perseverance they become advanced and complicated.
Moreover, previous experiences whether they were successful or not can help us to learn from them. In any field, achievements through trial and error can make us sure about the situation in which we are because overnight successes and something that we get just by doing it once cannot guarantee we are right in that way, so there is always the possibility of failure. Take Edison as an example, he makes a lot of effort to invent electricity and after thousands of failures, he could get his aim which was producing electricity. After this achievement he stated that he was sure about hundreds of ways that did not lead to producing electricity, hence he examined new ways until he got what he wanted. Admittedly, some people say that past experiences may lead to learned helplessness which can block innovation. It is true completely but does not mean that you should throw away your past experiences and just think about new things. It is better off letting your mind innovate while you are completing your past achievements. Only in this way can you make the best.
In conclusion, past achievements can play a significant role in the way of getting a prominent success and everybody should lay a solid foundation by learning from the past experiences whether they were full of successes or failures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 737, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...anted. Admittedly, some people say that past experiences may lead to learned helplessness which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 887, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...ot mean that you should throw away your past experiences and just think about new things. It is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...a solid foundation by learning from the past experiences whether they were full of successes or ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96052631579 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84680410791 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547368421053 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0242379736 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206928844204 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707116028202 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405138970449 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120464847372 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348882207542 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.