Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
It is said that it is a must for governments to dedicate financial resources to metropolises to help them be alive. The reason is that saving these cities lead to preserving the cultures and traditions of a country. However, I am of the belief that big cities are not the holder of the culture of a country and this role is related to small ones and villages that they should be paid more attention to than big cities.
To begin with, today the major cities all over the world are becoming similar to each other because the main functions of a metropolis are like each other. Some monuments which were one day the signs of a country's culture, they changed to skyscrapers which do not have any historical past. In addition, constructing buildings for the increasing population in big cities need quick methods of construction which lead to resembling places in the world and the structures and facades which do not have any root and are not indications of the culture of a region.
Moreover, small cities and rural areas are home to the lion's share of a country's culture that they are remnants of the old times. In these areas, people tend to keep up their costumes, their cultures, and also they live in the style which related mostly to the past and shows their background and their ancestor's way of living. So it is necessary for politicians to dedicate a significant budget to bucolic places and ancient buildings there, improving their conditions. For instance, in my country, Iran, many monuments are in rural areas and they are going to be destroyed by the natural disasters or ignorance of the governors, so they need financial resources to be revived.
Admittedly, it is said that most of the tourists in a country visit the main cities of a country, hence we need to pay more attention to these cities than other towns and villages. However, I can say that the metropolises have their income through some recreational facilities like amusement parks or multipurpose centers which are suitable for strolling and buying some souvenirs. So the need for preserving historical items can be earned through other ways but government budget.
In conclusion, small towns and bucolic areas need more governor's attention in comparison to big cities if governments tend to protect their background and root because metropolises can supply their financial needs through other ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governors'' or 'governor's'?
Suggestion: governors'; governor's
...small towns and bucolic areas need more governors attention in comparison to big cities i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91336633663 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74123801311 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470297029703 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.0210159914 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.785714286 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257414162048 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956404984224 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494221221669 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153201196118 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265789708259 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.