Trying
In all actuality, I think it is more probable that our bodies will surely deteriorate long before our minds do in any significant amount. Who can’t say that technology has made us lazier, but that’s the key word, lazy, not stupid.The ever increasing amount of technology that we incorporate into our daily lives makes people think and learn every day, possibly more than ever before.Our abilities to think, learn, philosophize, etc. may even reach limits never dreamed of before by average people. Using technology to solve problems will continue to help us realize our potential as a human race.If you think about it, using technology to solve more complicating problems gives humans a chance to expand their thinking and learning,opening up whole new worlds for many people. Many of these people are glad for the chance to expand their horizons by learning more, going to new places, and trying new things. If it wasn’t for the invention of new technological devices, I wouldn’t be sitting at this computer trying to philosophize about technology. It would be extremely hard for children in much poorer countries to learn and think for themselves with out the invention of the internet. Think what an impact the printing press, a technologically superior mackine at the time, had on the ability of the human race to learn and think.Right now we are seeing a golden age of technology, using it all the time during our every day lives. When we get up there’s instant coffee and the microwave and all these great things that help us get ready for our day. But we aren’t allowing our minds to deteriorate by using them, we are only making things easier for ourselves and saving time for other important things in our days. Going off to school or work in our cars instead of a horse and buggy. Think of the brain power and genius that was used to come up with that single invention that has changed the way we move across this globe.Using technology to solve our continually more complicated problems as a human race is definitely a good thing. Our ability to think for ourselves isn’t
deteriorating, it’s continuing to grow, moving on to higher though functions and more ingenious ideas. The ability to use what technology we have is an example.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...t that’s the key word, lazy, not stupid.The ever increasing amount of technology th...
^^^
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Our
...ery day, possibly more than ever before.Our abilities to think, learn, philosophize...
^^^
Line 1, column 597, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...s realize our potential as a human race.If you think about it, using technology to...
^^
Line 1, column 732, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , opening
...ce to expand their thinking and learning,opening up whole new worlds for many people. Ma...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1150, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...tries to learn and think for themselves with out the invention of the internet. Think wh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1335, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Right
...ty of the human race to learn and think.Right now we are seeing a golden age of techn...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 1931, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Using
...anged the way we move across this globe.Using technology to solve our continually mor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86010362694 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.732398047 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559585492228 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.814388005 60.3974514979 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.78571428571 5.21951772744 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.97078651685 40% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0465121279102 0.243740707755 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0247200913257 0.0831039109588 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606205380978 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0243184960857 0.150359130593 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243184960857 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.