To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The writer of the issue contends that it is only through an investigation of the features of the major cities in a country that the most salient traits of a society is revealed. This is a contention with which I generally agree for the following reasons.
First, most government institutions are situated in urban sites, and due to the significant impact that they have on a country's development, it seems essential to take into account the features of a society manifest in cosmopolitan cities. These days, it seems that the authorities that run a society inevitably shape the direction toward which a society is headed. Some people sometimes even argue that to examine one society, one only needs to appraise the officials governing that community. For instance, one cannot even think about studying the major features of the US without looking into the living conditions in large cities such as New York or Washington as a byproduct of government agencies being located there.
Second, most major cities have developed over time, and hence, analyzing their characteristic features, especially those influencing social behavior, could provide a window through which a country's culture and history could be more vividly observed. Take the case of Tehran, the capital city of Iran, for example. Although there are some cities in Iran with a longer and richer history, Tehran was recognized as the capital since the reign of Taherian, the tribe who ruled half the world one day. Since then, this city experienced myriad of social movements both from within and from outside the city. Several scholars have taken the job and produced a relatively thorough account of the values underlying the Iranian culture solely by looking into Tehran for evidence.
Nevertheless, what I alluded to in the body should not be overgeneralized; that is, the structures of rural communities are also worth reflecting as far as the analysis of a country's major features as a whole are concerned. Historical records are richer in villages, for instance, insofar as they cannot be readily overlooked when one wishes to describe the characteristics of the whole community, including those living in rural areas.
In conclusion, although this is clearly a contentious issue, I hold that the features in the major cities of a country are more prominent and thus more clearly represent the conditions that a given society lives in. However, this should not be taken as an indication that rural cites play no role in the development of cultural and historical values of a community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 771, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly by looking into Tehran for evidence. Nevertheless, what I alluded to in the b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12887828162 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85135051504 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527446300716 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7498821548 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.266666667 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9333333333 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.21951772744 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130434312864 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047187329523 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380709651506 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746756361683 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414174614909 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.