Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Its easy and worldwide access has indeed engendered a great controversy among academicians as to whether our lives, both on a personal and a social level, are adversely affected by the Internet or not. There are a great number of people advocating the view that access to the Internet has played merely an adverse role in our lives, enumerating a number of drawbacks brought about by its use. This view is in stark contrast with those suggesting that such a perspective is at best facile. I, for one, subscirbe to the latter viewpoint, believing that the Internet has been conducive to the way people communicate, and expanded our educational goals in a better way. It also offers great advice to individuals looking for jobs or trying to develop their careers.
First, there are several useful wevsites providing professional advice on a personal level. These days, it just takes a click to view vaccant positions in a firm. There are also great resources on the net for the people who wish to be promoted at their jobs. For example, I can recall one of my friends who had recently graduated from college, and was desperately looking for a job. No matter who he called or which company he referred to, he had not found a job he was interested in until he learned about this great website revealing vaccant positions based on people's area of interest. Thanks to this Internet resource, he was soon employed, and now he is one of the most successful people at the firm.
Besides offering personal advice, the Internet establishes a platform making communication much faster. The versatile access to social media is undeniable these days. This access has not only cut down on people's phone bill, but it has also provided easy and reliable access to those who are in urgently in need of communicating with a particular individual. For example, after being involved in an accident, I wanted to make a call to my father to come and help me. I called him on his phone, but apparently his phone's battery was dead. However, when I texted him on his What's App account, he instantaneously replied and come to me.
In sum, there is no doubt that access to the Internet has had great benefits for today's sophisticated world. It has surely facilitated not only an easier means of communication but also produced a multifaceted platform in which education could be more easily managed. There are indeed a number of great resources on the Internet providing guidance at a personal as well as socail level. With the current status quo, it is expected that the authorities in develping nations tend to be more inclined toward using the Internet to contribute to further development and prosperity of their nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 592, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ade a great fortune out of it. If it had not been for their courage to take such ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, regarding, second, so, still, therefore, whereas, for instance, by and large, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2101.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18765432099 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87457252476 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604938271605 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.5485171853 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.588235294 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8235294118 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161194959451 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483241500676 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0251456497801 0.0737576698707 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942289005453 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00461953199917 0.0645574589148 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.