To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
The issue statement given states that we can understand the traits of a society only when we understand the characteristics of the major cities. This statement could be partially accepted and partially rejected based on the society in different regions. People of different cities may also have different societies and they vary in different countries. Therefore, it is not right to take a decision that only learning about the major cities will conclude the characteristics of a society. But, we also should consider that in some regions or countries the characteristics of the societies remain constant that they can be easily understood by its major cities.
In some countries like India, the societies differ from each states in the country, which internally has different types of social difference between the different cities in the states. So to understand the characteristics of the Indian society one should start learning the culture of each city in the country. For example, consider Tamil Nadu, a state in India. It has more than 20 cities which have different traditional and cultural values of its own and each society differs from each other in their own way. The people of the Chennai city will behave different in a different way than that of the people in the Coimbatore city. Similarly, people of Madurai city will be different from the people of Tirunelveli city. Hence, it is difficult to conclude the social behavior of a country have a diversity of heritage and cultural values. Therefore, in this case it will be difficult to come to a conclusion about the society since the societies are diverse. This is a small part of the country. Imagine a country with 29 states and each states consists of more than 20 cities we cannot come to an inference about the society of the country. Moreover, people in each state speak different language which is also adds value to the argument that it is difficult to learn about the society by learning the major cities. The same theory can be applied to the European counties also where there are diverse languages and cultural differences between those countries.
The statement may also be valid for many other countries in the world. There are places around the world were the behavior of the societies in a country remain constant in a country. Places like Arab nations can be studied by their major cities. The rules in all the cities remain constant and has the same language throughout the countries. Their cultural values also remain the same throughout the Arab nations –They pose conditions to women that they should wear the burqa when they are outside. Even those countries refrain the suffrages for women. These countries can be easily studies by their facetious characteristics they keep up. Countries like Australia and America also contain the similar characteristic where they can be studied by their major cities as the cultures in each cites within the county is similar throughout. Therefore, it is also important to accept this point of view which is prevalent in different places.
Thus we come to know that it is irrelevant to come to a conclusion about this given issue. The coin has two sides and similarly this issue also has both positive and negative views. If we accept one view the other view becomes invalid and vice versa. Therefore, in this vast world it is a big challenge to learn about the behavior of each society. It can be verified by the major cities in some cases and can also be difficult to understand because of the vast societal differences within the regions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 567, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... the Chennai city will behave different in a different way than that of the people in the Coimbato...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...hich is prevalent in different places. Thus we come to know that it is irrelevant t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2971.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 603.0 442.535393258 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92703150912 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9554069778 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67954469863 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.366500829187 0.4932671777 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 942.3 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4965023348 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8387096774 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4516129032 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.06451612903 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.83258426966 310% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140745430185 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431182002226 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061768572948 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104766121235 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555376358946 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.