Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
The above argument states that the Woven baskets which has a unique pattern found in the village of Palea and was believed to be originated from there. It also states that similar baskets were also found in the Lithos which is a nearby city to Palea and hence these Palean baskets are not truly originated from Palea. This argument has flaws which weakens this argument to an extent. The flaws are stated below.
The argument mentions that the Woven baskets with a particular pattern were made by the Palean people. It could have been the scenario that these baskets were imported to the nearby cities because of their unique style. As per the statement, it is seen that only recently the archeologists have found the Palean baskets only in Lithos. The other nearby cities are still need to be explored. It might be possible that similar baskets can be found in the other cities as they might have been imported to the other cities. The archeologist report last year also stated that they have found a Palean monument that is very unique in its design and that design is not imprinted in any of the monuments in other nearby cities. It is noted that these woven baskets also contain the same unique design that of the monument. Hence it can be confirmed that these baskets were woven by the Palean people and imported to the other cities situated near to Palea because of its distinctive design.
The argument also states that the Litho city is across the Brim river and since there are no Palean boats found by the archeologists they come to the misconception that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean. This statement also contains a flaw. It was also stated by the archeologist that they have found the Litho boats near the river. It could have been a point where the Litho people travelled using their boats to import the woven baskets. The archeologist report long back has also stated that the Palean’s were poor in construction of boats and since the river is deep and broad they avoided travelling through this river. Therefore, this confirms that the Litho boats found might have been used to carry these woven baskets from the Palean city to the Litho city.
Thus this argument has flaws and hence we can conclude that the Palean baskets have been woven only by the Palean people and not by other countries. Hence we have to analyze a situation completely before coming to a conclusion. The archeologists have not completely validated the research and arrived to a conclusion that has many flaws. Therefore, we finally infer that the Palean baskets are originally from Palean.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 451 350
No. of Characters: 2124 1500
No. of Different Words: 149 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.608 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.71 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.283 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 133 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 82 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 54 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.963 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.591 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.359 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.525 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.155 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 370, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...thos. The other nearby cities are still need to be explored. It might be possible th...
^^^^
Line 2, column 613, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique
...ey have found a Palean monument that is very unique in its design and that design is not im...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 815, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ame unique design that of the monument. Hence it can be confirmed that these baskets ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...om the Palean city to the Litho city. Thus this argument has flaws and hence we ca...
^^^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...lean people and not by other countries. Hence we have to analyze a situation complete...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, hence, so, still, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.6327345309 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 13.6137724551 176% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 28.8173652695 177% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2162.0 2260.96107784 96% => OK
No of words: 451.0 441.139720559 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79379157428 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36210913998 2.78398813304 85% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 204.123752495 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.348115299335 0.468620217663 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.9 705.55239521 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7566915346 57.8364921388 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2727272727 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.324526521 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.70786347227 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.20758483034 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.67664670659 299% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312165922954 0.218282227539 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109787342805 0.0743258471296 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825851873598 0.0701772020484 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202837654959 0.128457276422 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529724762482 0.0628817314937 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.5979740519 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.32208582834 86% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.