To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Finding specification of a society has always been a crucial issue in order to provide essential information for making decision in the country. Serveying just charactristics of big urban areas to estimate all of the country's society would not be efficent enough and I disagree to this approach which I will discuss my reasons now.
Due to the fact that every countries have different society, if you deleve deeper into each country's society you would understand that even inside its borders you may face various people with completely different specifications. For example, they speak in different languages and accents and have various ethics, belifs or job opportunities which all of them would affect the hetrogenious of the society. Therefor, perusing just major cities could lead to misleading funding in the results and make tham useless or detriment for government and institution to make decision accordingly.
On the other hand, some may maintain that major cities and metropolitan areas have noumerous immigirants from around the country thus, it is an amalgamate of different cities and remote rural areas. Therefore investigation in these cities provide good idea as a sample of the whole. In fact, I should refute this idea because immigirants would be similar to the host citizen to some extend after some while and lessen their native attributes. Apart from that some charcteristic of the socity in a specific area could not transfer by immigration such as behaviour of people in some specific wheather climate or some jobs which are specific for that area.
To sume up, I believe in order to achieve a reasonable result in surveying society just observing major cities may lead to misleading result and I strongly suggest to expand the survey to different part of the country to get supportive result.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aking decision in the country. Serveying just charactristics of big urban areas t...
^^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...tristics of big urban areas to estimate all of the countrys society would not be efficent ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nious of the society. Therefor, perusing just major cities could lead to misleadi...
^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nts from around the country thus, it is an amalgamate of different cities and remote rural ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ifferent cities and remote rural areas. Therefore investigation in these cities provide g...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
... be similar to the host citizen to some extend after some while and lessen their nativ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest expanding'.
Suggestion: suggest expanding
...ead to misleading result and I strongly suggest to expand the survey to different part of the cou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, apart from, as to, for example, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 296.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17567567568 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8395104466 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587837837838 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.2569069629 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.2 118.986275619 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 5.21951772744 234% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143115985132 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513697347697 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569873592963 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083301423552 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663793094504 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.8420337079 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.