Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership
Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
Take for example the former president of Nigeria, Umar Miss Yar'adu though when he was elected as the president, he was a neophite yet he was able to achieve a great fit that was unable to be paralleled by any of his successors even up till date. The main reason for his success lies in the fact that he was surrounded by advisers that are well experienced and grounded in terms of politics. They were able to supply Jim with the history records of the past head of states and governor's which serves encouragement for him and he was also able to learn from their mistakes.
Furthermore, checking the history records of past leaders helps a leader to extrapolate into the future and preclude possibility of failure and also helps to avoid risks since the past leaders must have found themselves in similar situations in one way or the other. So the incumbent leader goes through the record of the past leaders and project about the future from it.
Some people may argue that trying to glean experiences from past leaders can open the door for godfatherism and corruption. Yes this is true but this should not be an issue if the leader is very objective.
From the points listed above, it is clear that the need to gain experience from past leaders can not be overestimated as a factor to success in office for a leader.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 2235.4752809 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 251.0 442.535393258 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61354581673 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60330444105 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589641434263 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 704.065955056 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6170015961 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8888888889 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179173057734 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136689730435 0.0831039109588 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.306012981129 0.0758088955206 404% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230797112287 0.150359130593 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.384940997055 0.0667264976115 577% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 100.480337079 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.