Pluto can not be considered a planet
The reading explains how Pluto was debased from being discovered as a planet to being classified as dwarf planet and that some scientists said it is still a planet while some argues otherwise and then gives three evidences to support why Pluto can not be considered a planet. The lecture proved wrong the three evidences given by the reading and affirms that Pluto is a planet. First, the reading said Pluto can not be a planet because it is too small by giving example of a larger planet(Eris) considered as dwarf planet and since other planets larger than it are still considered as dwarf planet. The lecture proved otherwise by affirming that Pluto is not that small saying that this analogy is wrong since it can not be applied to the case of rat and whale which are both considered mammals irrespective of the great discrepancies in and that the planets larger than Pluto are not that many. Also, the reading hints that Pluto failed to pass the requirement of a planet which is the fact that a planet must not have anything in it's orbit (i.e scattering parameter), but as for Pluto it's orbit is not clear so it is not a planet. The lecturer discounts this by saying scattering parameter can not be used to disqualify Pluto as a planet because the reading failed to consider another factor that determines scattering parameter which is the star. The relationship between Pluto and it's star is an evidence of Pluto being a planet Finally, the reading argues that Pluto resembles a comet than aThe reading explains how Pluto was debased from being discovered as a planet to being classified as dwarf planet and that some scientists said it is still a planet while some argues otherwise and then gives three evidences to support why Pluto can not be considered a planet. The lecture proved wrong the three evidences given by the reading and affirms that Pluto is a planet. First, the reading said Pluto can not be a planet because it is too small by giving example of a larger planet(Eris) considered as dwarf planet and since other planets larger than it are still considered as dwarf planet. The lecture proved otherwise by affirming that Pluto is not that small saying that this analogy is wrong since it can not be applied to the case of rat and whale which are both considered mammals irrespective of the great discrepancies in and that the planets larger than Pluto are not that many. Also, the reading hints that Pluto failed to pass the requirement of a planet which is the fact that a planet must not have anything in it's orbit (i.e scattering parameter), but as for Pluto it's orbit is not clear so it is not a planet. The lecturer discounts this by saying scattering parameter can not be used to disqualify Pluto as a planet because the reading failed to consider another factor that determines scattering parameter which is the star. The relationship between Pluto and it's star is an evidence of Pluto being a planet Finally, the reading argues that Pluto resembles a comet than aThe reading explains how Pluto was debased from being discovered as a planet to being classified as dwarf planet and that some scientists said it is still a planet while some argues otherwise and then gives three evidences to support why Pluto can not be considered a planet. The lecture proved wrong the three evidences given by the reading and affirms that Pluto is a planet. First, the reading said Pluto can not be a planet because it is too small by giving example of a larger planet(Eris) considered as dwarf planet and since other planets larger than it are still considered as dwarf planet. The lecture proved otherwise by affirming that Pluto is not that small saying that this analogy is wrong since it can not be applied to the case of rat and whale which are both considered mammals irrespective of the great discrepancies in and that the planets larger than Pluto are not that many. Also, the reading hints that Pluto failed to pass the requirement of a planet which is the fact that a planet must not have anything in it's orbit (i.e scattering parameter), but as for Pluto it's orbit is not clear so it is not a planet. The lecturer discounts this by saying scattering parameter can not be used to disqualify Pluto as a planet because the reading failed to consider another factor that determines scattering parameter which is the star. The relationship between Pluto and it's star is an evidence of Pluto being a planet Finally, the reading argues that Pluto resembles a comet than a planet because of its irregular shape. However, the lecture said this can not be an evidence to gainsay Pluto as a planet since it is proven that Pluto has five large moons whereas a comet should not have a moon.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1769, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y Pluto can not be considered a planet. The lecture proved wrong the three evidence...
^^^
Line 1, column 3261, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y Pluto can not be considered a planet. The lecture proved wrong the three evidence...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, still, then, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 65.0 10.4613686534 621% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 24.0 7.30242825607 329% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 43.0 12.0772626932 356% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 70.0 22.412803532 312% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 30.3222958057 218% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3860.0 1373.03311258 281% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 830.0 270.72406181 307% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65060240964 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.36746873133 4.04702891845 133% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4973901314 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.148192771084 0.540411800872 27% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1230.3 419.366225166 293% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 23.0 8.23620309051 279% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 41.0 21.2450331126 193% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.8749079528 49.2860985944 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 193.0 110.228320801 175% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.5 21.698381199 191% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95 7.06452816374 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 4.45695364238 269% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.635170793153 0.272083759551 233% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.354375557979 0.0996497079465 356% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133805741657 0.0662205650399 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.635170793153 0.162205337803 392% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 13.3589403974 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.32 53.8541721854 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.0289183223 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.58 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.42419426049 79% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.498013245 175% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.2008830022 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.