The universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
The author infers that universities should require every students to take a variety of courses outside the student's major. Students in colleges should accumulate deep understanding in their core, and requiring variety of courses could impede their concentration to core study. However students in colleges might find their real interest and talents while studying other courses. What is more there are many unexpected synergy effects between ostensibly distinct fields and there are no fields that are independent to any others. Therefore I agree with author's claim.
Some people argues that mandating students to take lectures of other fields could be burdensome to students studying their majors. For example, student who is currently majoring cook, could regard taking chemical, biology lectures as useless. I admit that colleges should provide environment that make students focus on their core field but I believe that studying other fields might help their innovation in their major. Nowadays society is more complex than ever before, and there too many unexpected synergy effect between fields. For example let us consider molecule gastronomy which successfully woos customers these days. Nowadays cook applies their chemical knowledge to their dishes which increase fanciness and taste of their food. Likewise, artists in these days use bugs and animals in their art piece which requires biological knowledge. Without those examples, there are many innovations that was brought by successful combination of diverse fields. Student might create innovation on their fields while taking other lectures.
What is more, every field is dependent to at least one other fields and studying variety of courses might provide deeper understanding. For example let us consider algorithm, a method to solve particular problem, in Computer Science. To evaluate specific algorithm's performance and compare efficiency between algorithms, it requires lots of math knowledge. In other words, students in computer science could not make profound understanding of algorithm without studying math. Making effective machine that includes artificial intelligence also demands probability, statistics, machine, etc knowledge. Likewise these days we cannot accomplish great job only by studying core field and it is essential to take diverse courses.
Finally, we should consider that most of students entering college do not experience sufficiently to find their real talents and one major role of university is to provide them large experience to find their interest. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, 80 percent of students in the United States change their major at least once. What is more, college students change their major three times on average. Registering diverse lectures could help students to find real dream. As we all know, it is more difficult to change major after graduate and without taking diverse lecture, they could not acknowledge their real talent forever.
To sum up, even though I admit that mandating diverse lecture course can be demanding, I believe that it will be benefit for students in that courses in other fields are useful to their greater accomplishment and students could experience more by taking diverse courses. Therefore I agree with the author.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...pede their concentration to core study. However students in colleges might find their r...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 530, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...lds that are independent to any others. Therefore I agree with authors claim. Some peo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun synergy seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much unexpected synergy', 'a good deal of unexpected synergy'.
Suggestion: much unexpected synergy; a good deal of unexpected synergy
...complex than ever before, and there too many unexpected synergy effect between fields. For example let ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'algorithms'' or 'algorithm's'?
Suggestion: algorithms'; algorithm's
... Computer Science. To evaluate specific algorithms performance and compare efficiency betw...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 602, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...ty, statistics, machine, etc knowledge. Likewise these days we cannot accomplish great j...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the students') or simply say ''most students''.
Suggestion: most of the students; most students
...es. Finally, we should consider that most of students entering college do not experience suff...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 272, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...erience more by taking diverse courses. Therefore I agree with the author.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, likewise, so, therefore, while, at least, for example, of course, in other words, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2807.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 503.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58051689861 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68585746793 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499005964215 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 867.6 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0547527229 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.962962963 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6296296296 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391566544846 0.243740707755 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115022560617 0.0831039109588 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144017052351 0.0758088955206 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256259869575 0.150359130593 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125016986965 0.0667264976115 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.