Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
The author infers that in any field including business, politics, education, government leaders should step down after five years in that revitalization through new leadership is surest path to success. I admit that giving fresh energy is essential for success, however long-standing leader does not always entail obsolete methods and it actually can induce vitality. What is more, the leading status requires lots of experience and mandating five years to managers could make managers seek only short-term effect. Therefore I disagree with the author.
To begin with, some people argue that new leader bring freshness to team and it is necessary to manage the team successfully. For example, let us consider famous football club Liverpool. After Liverpool changes team manager to Klopp, Klopp changes a lot. Their team environment became more energetic than before and team member were being more vigorous. As consequence, Liverpool had won champions league and premier league which they failed to accomplish for decades. However it does not imply that fields with leaders who manages for long periods does not have energy. Steve Jobs, for example, was leader of Apple more than ten years. However he had completed lots of innovations: I-pod, I-phone, I-mac, etc which were acclaimed for its creativity. If Apple mandate him to relinquish his status, Apple might not make such accomplishment and might be just ordinary corporation not an exclusive one.
Secondly, mandating leaders to resign their status after five years could discourage leaders from focusing on long-term effects. As we all know, there are several plans and projects which need times to make positive effects. However if long period of management is not assured, the managers might be reluctant to begin the project and even though they begin it, it is less likely to complete. Obama Care, for example, was possible to established because United States allowed reelection. If United States does not allow reelection many great policies might not be successfully accomplished or not even started.
What is more, sufficient experience is big factor of being great leader. Nowadays society becomes more complex than ever before. Therefore to make superior performance as leader, he/she should consider lots of aspects and factors and it requires experiences. Based on research by CLC(Corporate Leadership Council), 50% of new leaders fail in three years. Tom peters who is well-known for business management also emphasizes 'know-how' saying leader learns though experiences. In consequence, Immature leaders are more likely to fail than mature ones and mandating people in power to step down after short periods reduces the pools of prospective leaders who are mature.
In conclusion, I disagree with the claim for above mentioned reasons. Even though employing new leader can bring revitalization to enterprise, fields can be still innovative even though they employ same leader for long periods. Demanding leader to step down after five years will cause disadvantage to those fields rather than causing benefit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the surest'.
Suggestion: is the surest
...t revitalization through new leadership is surest path to success. I admit that giving fr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 516, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e managers seek only short-term effect. Therefore I disagree with the author. To begin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... they failed to accomplish for decades. However it does not imply that fields with lead...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 638, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...as leader of Apple more than ten years. However he had completed lots of innovations: I...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ch need times to make positive effects. However if long period of management is not ass...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... becomes more complex than ever before. Therefore to make superior performance as leader,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quires experiences. Based on research by CLCCorporate Leadership Council, 50% of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2609.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 481.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42411642412 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70385870048 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56340956341 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 801.0 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3766201055 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6296296296 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8148148148 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81481481481 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209304354818 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552702170556 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977046612899 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136259779451 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984101586581 0.0667264976115 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 100.480337079 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.