"We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own."; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning."

Essay topics:

"We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own."; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning."

Disagreement with people's viewpoint really enhances our knowledge! Speaker claims that disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. I concede with this aspect because disagreement may cause impede of learning.
Disagreement can cause insignificant debate as a consequence of confliction between opponent people. Take an instance, various tv channel organizes talk show with present issue and offer some expert to attend. The guest of this program presents their valuable and wise opinion. Sometimes it contradicts with the opponent guest aspect and result is a confliction. Moreover, it has become so serious that they disrespect and bitter criticism of opponent viewpoint.
Besides, sharing the knowledge any human can more advance, motivated and, encouraged. For example, two students from an astronomy department discuss their upcoming project. This discussion principle and reasoning can lead them a better outcome of their fundamental assumption. As a result, the individual could achieve a better result and expand their knowledge. In this discussion one may disagree with other member viewpoint but, never impair their learning or never cause stress.
Moreover, NASA is the one of the biggest space company where a large number of people work together in a group to discover mysterious knowledge. If there is disagreement among them the entire project will be jeopardized. I personally believe that, sometimes group member may be disagreeing with some reasoning but, for better ramification everyone should responsible and work together.
Some people objections that, human at first disagree that earth is round until, Aristotle declare that earth is a sphere. So, disagree sometimes enhance knowledge. But, how about Einstein and Stephen Honking. Einstein established relativity theory and Stephen Honking research more about it and reveal more profound knowledge.
Finally, it can conclude that to enhance our knowledge we should agree with other people aspect, knowledge, concept and, respect their opinion. Together we can obtain a better outcome.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... one of the biggest space company where a large number of people work together in a group to disc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...group to discover mysterious knowledge. If there is disagreement among them the en...
^^
Line 4, column 275, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...elieve that, sometimes group member may be disagreeing with some reasoning but, for better ram...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Aristotle) must be used with a third-person verb: 'declares'.
Suggestion: declares
...ee that earth is round until, Aristotle declare that earth is a sphere. So, disagree so...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, really, so, for example, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 309.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70873786408 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83547231107 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592233009709 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5804445847 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.0 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7142857143 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04761904762 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178520485817 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521871896848 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604137629008 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998489937978 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678281802866 0.0667264976115 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.8420337079 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.