We learn much more from people whose views we share than people whose views contradict ours.
Learning something is a holistic process which comes from different aspect and viewpoint. I mostly disagree with the argument because seeing something from a different point of view gives a better understanding of the topic and make our position more accurate and firm. However, in many cases, it may also prove to be disadvantageous.
A Certain topic may be viewed from a different angle all of which may be true simultaneously. While learning something we should explore all the sides of a topic to get a better view and understanding of the topic. Ignoring opinions which contradicts our's may be detrimental to our own argument as we are neglecting the opportunity to test and make our argument more viable. Contradictions give the opportunity to see us what is wrong with our arguments, what can be done to make it more acceptable or why it is true. So, contradictory arguments actually act in favor of the argument that it contradicts. For instance, when we see the history of science, at first light was considered a wave. But then some scientists came with the contention that light can be particles also. These contradictory scientific theories made a massive contribution to understanding the nature of light and created the basis for modern physics. If certain theories were rejected just because they contradict the popular one, then we wouldn't have the scientific advancements that we have now.
The Inclination to one opinion may prove fatal as it destroys opinions which might create a whole new line of thought process.
However, adverse opinions don't always give the opportunity to thrive. Sometimes, it may hinder the progress. For example, in medieval Europe, it was a dark age for science as Churches hold great power over society and most people were afraid to go against the church.
Scientific advancements stood still as the Chruch punished or even sentenced the scientist to death whose theories went against religious belief. Scientists like Bruno, Copernicus was killed even Gallilieo was afraid to publish his work publicly. If there were no or little adversity from Church and religious people then science would have advanced more than it actually did. Adverse conditions are not always conducive to an opinion. It may even destroy the environment to nurture different contentions.
It is the constructive contradictions that test one's opinion make it more accurate and palatable. So we must take into account the opinions that go against our opinion for the sake of our own good. However, in some cases, the effects may be reverse.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 772, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... contention that light can be particles also. These contradictory scientific theorie...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1013, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...hey contradict the popular one, then we wouldnt have the scientific advancements that w...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 27, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...cess. However, adverse opinions dont always give the opportunity to thrive. ...
^^^^
Line 17, column 262, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ublish his work publicly. If there were no or little adversity from Church and rel...
^^
Line 23, column 49, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e constructive contradictions that test ones opinion make it more accurate and palat...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, then, while, for example, for instance, in many cases, in some cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19477434679 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94313377818 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524940617577 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8307405499 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.125 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5416666667 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70833333333 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192630088777 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449626452913 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485595195335 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780957656391 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517497666336 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.