The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
We live in an era where government in chosen by people. People elect the person or party who will lead them. So if a government does not work efficiently then people have the right to complaint and, if it is too severe, can elect other person or party replacing previous one. Therefore, I believe, that citizens constant questions to the government keeps the politicians in check, and the system work properly because if they don't then might be removed from that position. But, if a government is working for the benefit of its peoples, irrelevant complaining can discourage and dishearten the politicians, which will ultimately affect the growth of the country.
For instance, suppose a group is unhappy with the working of the system they elected, because they did not fulfilled the promises they made during election, which can be anything like building a temple or church, helping the poor people by providing them with basic human needs, and many more, then their questioning to the government is valid. Only by questioning the goverment this group can state its point and can force the system to take actions regarding that. If people will not check the government, it can become indifferent towards the growth of the people and country.
Moreover, questioning the system tells that citizens are sedulously tracking the work of the elected government, and if they find out that they are not working seriously, people might not re-elect them in next elections.
But, it is not always true that government isn't working efficaciously. Certainly, government officials also want to improve and flourish their country, and that is why they have been elected. So when officials are working hard for the nation, at that time, questioning there working might produce an adverse effect on motivations, and they might get daunted.
Thus, from my point of view, if people think that the elected is not working efficiently like not completing the promises it made then people should question the government regarding that. Whereas, if they are working diligently then it is discouraging for them to face questions from the very people they are working for.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 427, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...he system work properly because if they dont then might be removed from that positio...
^^^^
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'fulfil', 'fulfill'
Suggestion: fulfil; fulfill
...stem they elected, because they did not fulfilled the promises they made during election,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
..., it is not always true that government isnt working efficaciously. Certainly, gover...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0676056338 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69024260555 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495774647887 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.9492379671 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111609778066 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436355608101 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329418669644 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0695459787003 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366368170522 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.