The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The sole purpose of having a government is to ensure the welfare of people. In any way, if that is not being fulfilled, the authorities must be questioned for reformation. People, who elects the ruling body, should also be responsible in participating in providing feedback or question the decision of government, when they aren’t satisfied. Thus, I agree with the given claim that the more the people questions the authority, the better will be people’s well being. The reason of being in favor of the claim is delineated in the body paragraphs.
First of all, if there comes a time when the ruling party isn’t working towards the well being of it’s people, it must be interrogated for it’s step. All people, either directly or indirectly, should be involved in giving feedback and asking questions on the decision taken. If the people aren’t satisfied, the entire motive of having the government falls apart. Therefore, constant questioning will help government to make better choices. It will then work what’s best for its people. To outline further, let’s consider a hypothetical situation, where the ruling body decides to ruin the farm area for building industries. Even though the industries can potentially create jobs for many people and attribute to the revenue of the region, we must question; whether the farmers will be equally happy with this step. If they aren’t happy with the decision, they must question the government. This way government will take a tactful decision, in order to ensure the overall welfare of every individual.
In addition, if people aren’t getting a say in government’s decision, they must ask for change in government. Democracy dies when rulers tend to renounce public opinion. Rulers are nothing but slaves to it’s public and if it fails to serve, it must leave the chair. Democracy is shifted to monarchy if the government doesn’t listen to its people. The example of Adolf Hitler well suits this position. When he was elected, he didn’t let his people speak and this led to widespread disregard of the government. The people weren’t happy. Hence, questioning the wrong government to leave the chair is the right way to make sure of people’s welfare.
However, government runs on the motivation of it’s people. Thus, unnecessary questioning can harass the government and lead to lesser productivity. People should understand the reason behind government’s step and only if they feel it as farcical, they should question the government. Sometimes, it so happens that some decision taken by government is to benefit the long-term goals at cost of some short-term problems. People should try to comprehend the entire situation before raising their voice.
In summary, the overall welfare of people is guaranteed when they question the authority ruling them. While, in doing so they should take into account of the situation and all possible solutions. Only if they feel, government could have chosen a better solution, they should question government’s decision.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in summary, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 12.9106741573 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2623.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36400817996 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02668711484 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496932515337 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5738826062 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4333333333 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142146646227 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466595274652 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394901718116 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097078257868 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529159793588 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.