The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority
A society, in which the mass people can quesntion the authority, is well improved compared to a society in which the authority practices autocratic power. So, in order to ensure the well-being of a society people should question authority.
In democratic world mass people are the source of every power: fate of the society depends on their judgment and control on the authority or government. If the authority feel bound to the people, then there is not much enough space available for the authority to do any wrong thing. Because, any fault thing the authority will do, the people of the society are going to raise their voice against it and challenge the authority. So, the authority performs its job with utmost sincerity and integrity with an aim to improve the condition of the society.
For example, recently in Bangladesh the city water supply system authority, locally known as Dhaka WASA, was subjected to vehement outcry of people because of its statement that they serve pure drinking water to the city people. Hearing their statement the city people challenged them with proof of polluted water and questioned their performance. Eventually, the authority of WASA realized their fault and are now trying with greater sincerity to ensure supply of pure drinking water, a basic need of mass people. So, in this case if the authority were autocratic and not bound to the people, then there would not show any tendency to improve the water quality and ultimately it is the society which would be the sufferer.
Quota system, an extremely unwarranted system, has been recently uprooted from Bangladesh. This system requires that 30% of national job sector will be preserved for certain portion of the society which prevented the meritorious students from getting job and created a social disruption. Mass people, gathered together against this rule and challenged the government to change this rule. Eventually, the government ceded to the people and was forced to change the rule which is badly required for the improvement of socio-economic condition of the general people. So, if the people had no say about the government's performance, then ultimately those very people of the society would be the sufferer.
Venality is a common problem for any authoisty which is not bound to answer for its performance. However, if the people of the society have that power to question the authority for everything, then the authority will not involve themselves in any kind of corruption and the betterment of the society thus be ensured.
However, it is very important to ensure that the people which are questioning are the one who want the betterment of the society and are the patriot one. Because, in every society there are certain portion of people who are against the current authority and find faults in every project taken by the authority whether good or bad. So, if it appears that the mass people are questioning and they are the ones who love their country and the society, only then questioning the government or authority for its performance would be effective and the betterment of the society would be ensured otherwise not.
A society in which the mass people involve themselves in questioning the activity of the authority is sure to improve in each and every sector compared to the society in which the people have no say against the authority.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o do any wrong thing. Because, any fault thing the authority will do, the people ...
^^
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eritorious students from getting job and created a social disruption. Mass people...
^^
Line 7, column 605, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... So, if the people had no say about the governments performance, then ultimately those very...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, thus, well, as for, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2815.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 561.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01782531194 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86676880123 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67219322086 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.393939393939 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 903.6 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7144225504 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.047619048 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349566383157 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126382360236 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910639285712 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218398450259 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735528682566 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.