The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Well being of a society depends upon the people living in it. A society is a fragment of the livelihood and it coalesces as a whole neighborhood and eventually as a part of the whole nation. So the well being of society plays a cardinal role and should be taken seriously in a circumscribed manner. Society functions well if the authoritative committee has mandated some rules and is working efficiently. the statement suggest that if people questions the authority about the proposed plan of work and its efficiency then it would enhance the output of wellbeing of the society, to which in my opinion I strongly agree and corroborate my views with following reasons.
First of all, as the society is led by the authoritative committee which is set up by the people by their mandate and is for the people, so the pith of the authoritative committee is to serve for the people of the society. There should be complete transparency in the authoritative committee so the people are well aware about the efficacy of the committee and don’t have to question the authencity of work of the committee. For instance, if a authoritative committee is working without any input from the people of the society or on their own views, then there are chances that their authencity would be questioned by the people. This can be avoided by working with the view of the society in mind and transparency in the committee.
Secondly, there are chances that the authoritative committee is corrupt and is working without any ethics and keeping the people of the society in deception about the efficiency of their work. The turpitude nature of the committee could only be uncovered when the people in society starts questioning the authoritative committee. For instance, a authoritative committee who is duping the society by corrupt nature which causes hindrance in the well being of the society, due to which it is being interrogated by the people which would uncover the deeds of the committee and put forth the truth of the committee. This way the cautious nature of people in the society would help in efficient working of the authorities.
Finally, well being of people is in their own hands by how they form the authoritative committee, how they follow the mandated rules and how aware they are about the work efficiency of the committee. So for instances, if an individual who does not care about the societies well being would isolate himself from the society and would not care what’s going on in the society until something which would make him realize about the societies well being is very necessary and one should equally participate in taking authoritative decisions and questioning the authorities about the well being of the society.
To conclude, the cautious behavior of the society members helps in questioning the authorities and elicit the truth about how efficiently they are working to facilitate well being for the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 406, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... some rules and is working efficiently. the statement suggest that if people questi...
^^^
Line 1, column 420, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...d is working efficiently. the statement suggest that if people questions the authority ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...work of the committee. For instance, if a authoritative committee is working with...
^
Line 9, column 345, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... authoritative committee. For instance, a authoritative committee who is duping t...
^
Line 9, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the society, due to which it is being interrogated by the people which would u...
^^
Line 17, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the authorities and elicit the truth about how efficiently they are working t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for instance, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2465.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 494.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98987854251 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90815102072 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.368421052632 0.4932671777 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 780.3 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.7060173482 60.3974514979 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.0625 118.986275619 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.875 23.4991977007 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356684569544 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15627668736 0.0831039109588 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831817129947 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239034668457 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616579115934 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.