The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
One of the most significant aspects of human development is the ability to reach as much information as possible. This way, global trends, tendencies and proclivities will be easily grasped by the people and, if necessary, can be asked from the relevant authorities. In this sense I mostly agree with the statement, while I acknowledge that this sense of questioning must be intricately followed as I will mention below.
Firstly, the more people are informed the more they are aware about what is going on the global level. One of the most important factors to this end will be questioning what their government is doing and what they should be doing. This will make them more responsive and will create the urge to investigate and learn more and more. For example, let’s assume that a government is reluctant to make investment to a very sophisticated and technological health equipment system aiming to deal with recent pandemic that is tearing down the long established norms of human lives. If the peoples of that country are aware of the recent developments and following the global trends they will surely be capable of evaluating the decision of their government and they can surely find a way to bring their reaction to the attention of relevant authorities since they are not confined with what their officials tell them to believe. This will not only create a pressure on the government to act but also give them the opportunity to refresh themselves.
Secondly, governments are always prone to exploiting. No matter how educated they are, no matter how sincere they are, government officials have always been under the spotlight. There is no exception to this. They must have the inner feeling that they are being watched to be able to overcome the feeling of self indulgence. The only way to realize this will always be with the attendance of the people. They must show that officials are the representatives of the people not they are not the ruler and their every move will be watched with a sense of hesitation. They must demonstrate not only their aims but also their motives and the logical reasons behind their every decision to make their voters satisfied.
However, being able to watch politicians and decision takers is always a difficult and technical duty to do. There is always need for a technical perspective which regular voters usually lack. Following the judiciary and legislatory processes is an immense job that can be taken care of only by big think tanks or law firms. Besides, this will also create a burden on the people who actually feel relieved by just voting and giving the responsibility to the politicians. And they lack the enthusiasm when it comes to the questioning the politicians and morals of their decisions. They just want to decide that on the voting day which they do once in a couple of years.
In the conclusion, I mostly agree that people should follow and evaluate the actions of their governments to let them know that they are being followed to be able to prosper. However this will always be costly and difficult for ordinary people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 176, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e being followed to be able to prosper. However this will always be costly and difficul...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2580.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 527.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89563567362 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71877111677 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453510436433 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 810.0 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3564880123 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9583333333 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114200689887 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388058625062 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264251699408 0.0758088955206 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0803241021858 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201849940906 0.0667264976115 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.